Gdańsk Common Message

CCB • June 24, 2026

Gdańsk Common Message

Gdańsk (Poland), 24 June 2026 - Coalition Clean Baltic (CCB) endorsed the Gdańsk Common Message published on the occasion of the Ukraine Recovery Conference. You can read the full Message below.


***

At a defining moment for Ukraine’s future, civil society speaks with a united voice. The Gdańsk
Common Message sets out a shared contribution to the global conversation on Ukraine’s
recovery and European path, bringing together the perspectives and expertise of Ukrainian
and international civil society organisations. Developed ahead of the Ukraine Recovery
Conference 2026, it is addressed to Ukrainian national authorities, international partners, and
all those shaping recovery efforts. It serves as a benchmark for the Ukraine Donor Platform
and its members to track whether commitments are translated into real action.

We emphasise that Ukraine’s recovery must be people-centred, grounded in human
rights, and built as a genuine partnership in which civil society acts not just as a participant
but as a strategic partner
. Throughout Russia’s war against Ukraine, civil society has been
at the forefront of the national response. It has mobilised billions of hryvnias in support for
defence and security, delivered immediate humanitarian assistance, strengthened local
resilience, and driven innovation in the most challenging conditions. Civil society organisations
have supported Ukraine’s EU integration and reform path by helping develop public policies
and providing independent expertise, piloted sustainable reconstruction initiatives and
developed tools that advance transparency and accountability. We call for accountability and
action that will remove barriers to further collaboration and true cross-sectoral partnership
for making the recovery deliver.

Gdańsk, with its legacy of solidarity, civic participation, and democratic transformation,
provides a powerful setting for this Message. It reminds us that lasting change is driven by
engaged citizens and shared responsibility. In this spirit, we call on all partners to ensure that
the principles of the Gdańsk Common Message guide decisions, investments, and actions
shaping Ukraine’s recovery trajectory.


Our Vision for Recovery


We envision a people-centred and rights-based recovery for Ukraine, grounded in security
and justice as indispensable preconditions for lasting peace in Europe. Recovery must
continue even amid ongoing hostilities, but it can only fully take root when Ukraine is safe
through a complete cessation of aggression, credible security guarantees, protection and
strengthened resilience for its people and infrastructure. A just and lasting peace is essential
and must include accountability for aggression, prosecution of war crimes, and legally
binding reparations by Russia. Without security and justice, recovery efforts will be fragile
and incomplete. Recovery must be inclusive, participatory, professionally delivered and locally
owned, with full participation of civil society as an equal partner at all stages.


Priority Actions


Delivering this vision will require changes not only in what recovery actors fund, but also in
how recovery decisions are made and implemented. The following actions identify practical
steps that the Government of Ukraine, international partners, and civil society can take to
translate these principles into lasting change.


We call on the Government of Ukraine and international partners to jointly ensure that:
• Civil society is recognised as a co-author of recovery, including through structured
mechanisms and formats for regular and meaningful engagement with the Ukraine
Donor Platform.
• Reform commitments for European integration are translated into action by
embedding human rights, anti-corruption safeguards, and the rule of law across all
stages of recovery.
• Humanitarian, early response, and development financing form coherent pathways
toward long-term resilience and recovery by aligning funding instruments to
support displaced populations and affected communities from emergency response to
sustainable economic development and social participation.
• Energy resilience is further strengthened through the development of decentralised,
renewable-based systems that enhance security, support recovery, and ensure reliable
access to critical services across communities.
• Long-term investments in people and essential social services are prioritised,
including dedicated financing for affordable housing, social infrastructure, healthcare,
education, workforce development, youth leadership, mental health services, and
rehabilitation that enables Ukrainians to live, return, and thrive in their communities.
• Coordinated frameworks for strengthening social cohesion and facilitating return,
(re)integration, and inclusion are developed to support veterans, displaced Ukrainians,
persons with disabilities, and other groups disproportionately affected, ensuring no one
is left behind.
• Structured partnerships connect Ukrainian and European institutions and
communities to support peer learning, project preparation, participatory planning, co-
financing, monitoring, public consultation, and alignment with EU standards.


Additionally, we call on the Government of Ukraine to ensure that:
• Integrated development strategies are created at all levels, ensuring that recovery
priorities are locally driven, informed by community needs, and designed in partnership
with civil society, local authorities, businesses, and affected populations.
• National and local institutions are equipped to lead recovery and EU integration by
advancing public administration reform, better coordinating technical assistance, and
developing measures to attract, retain, and empower qualified public servants.
• Mechanisms for participation are institutionalised across recovery governance,
including through implementation of the Law of Ukraine „On Public Consultations” and
regular engagement with civil society, communities, and affected groups.
• Culture and independent media are recognised as cross-cutting and essential
components of identity, social resilience and democratic participation, and their
durability is supported as part of recovery investments.
• Environmental safeguards are upheld across all the sectors of the economy through
implementation of EU-aligned policies, in particular environmental assessments,
monitoring, control and nature conservation, so that recovery accelerates accession
readiness and builds country’s resilience.


Additionally, we call on international partners and the Ukraine Donor Platform to ensure that:
• Direct, flexible, and multi-year financing is expanded for local recovery actors,
including civil society, community initiatives, and social enterprises, while simplifying
compliance requirements and reducing reliance on international intermediaries.
• Recovery moves beyond fragmented projects toward integrated, locally owned
approaches, including by reducing the disconnect between international donor
frameworks and community-level interventions that give communities greater decision-
making power and support a more coherent approach to building back better.
• Frameworks for social and economic inclusion are strengthened through
qualification recognition, skills development, psychosocial support, rehabilitation, and
(re)integration programmes for displaced Ukrainians, veterans, persons with disabilities,
and other affected groups, enabling their participation in the labour market and society.


***

Gdańsk Common Message (English & Ukrainian, PDF).


By CCB • November 6, 2026
Widespread exploitation of the critically endangered European eel population continues against scientific advice, despite no signs of recovery. Today, the International Council for Exploration of the Sea, ICES, published its scientific advice on fishing opportunities and conservation for European eel for 2027. As in previous years, ICES advises zero catch for all life stages, all uses and in all habitats. Despite very clear advice, over 1,500 tonnes were landed commercially in the EU in 2025 with an additional > 300 tonnes taken in recreational fisheries. The scientific advice on European eel requested by the EU, the UK and Norway makes very clear that no catches can be considered sustainable and that the “zero catch” also applies to glass eel landings used for restocking and aquaculture. Given the state of the eel population, ICES advises that all other anthropogenic impacts, such as pumping stations, hydropower and pollution, should also be zero. The European eel (Anguilla anguilla) has been listed as Critically Endangered by IUCN since 2008, and is on the European Red List for freshwater fish. It is also included in Appendix II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) and listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) since 2007. Despite the need for protection and efforts to aid its recovery, European eel continues to be fished across most of its natural range. In the past decade, total reported commercial landings of yellow and silver eel have remained above 2 000 tonnes per year; with several countries reporting annual landings of over 100 tonnes. In 2025, reported commercial glass eel landings were 57.1 tonnes. Where available, estimates of national recreational landings of yellow and silver eels show that they can be of the same order of magnitude as those of commercial fisheries. All in contradiction with the scientific advice. Only Ireland, Slovenia, Malta and Norway have closed all fishing for the species. In the EU, the Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel was adopted in 2007 – almost 20 years ago. Since then, there has been some fluctuations in the very low levels of recruitment and yellow eel index, but no recovery. For 2026, levels are extremely low again with the recruitment index for “Elsewhere Europe” at 6.4 % and North Sea at 1.2 % of the 1960–1979 reference level, respectively. – One has to wonder when European eel will be considered critically endangered enough for this exploitation to stop, says Niki Sporrong, Senior Policy Advisor for Migratory Fish at Coalition Clean Baltic. When will the obligation to protect and restore the population set out both in EU law and international agreements be prioritised? Measures to aid eel recovery have been agreed and implemented across and beyond the EU. Mediterranean long-term management measures for European eel were agreed in 2024 under the General Fisheries Committee for the Mediterranean (GFCM). Eel fishing closures, together with a complete ban of recreational fishing, intended to protect eel migration and recruitment have been adopted in EU marine waters, but their application has had insufficient effects on fishing mortality so far. Trade in European eel is regulated under CITES, and only earlier this year a Single Species Action Plan for the full range of the population was adopted by CMS. But without properly addressing key threats such as fishing, migration barriers and habitat loss it is hard to see how even the resilient eel will be able to survive combined pressures further exacerbated by climate change. – Exploitation of European eel continues against scientific advice, says Niki Sporrong. Agreed EU objectives for the rebuilding of fish stocks and biodiversity are simply not applied to this remarkable species. Urgent measures to minimise eel mortality must be implemented now, in both national, EU and international waters. —END— Notes to editors: [1] The European eel (Anguilla anguilla) population has been declining for a long time and is classified as Critically Endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN, 2018). [2] The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) data on recruitment shows a dramatic decline since the assessment baseline (1960-1979), and no significant recovery. Glass eel recruitment continues to be very low. This year, the preliminary recruitment index for the North Sea area is 1.2 % of the baseline average and for “elsewhere Europe” 6.4 %. Yellow eel recruitment in 2024 was estimated to 16.4 %. [3] Assessment of European eel is complex due to the great geographical range of the population, including a number of countries outside of the ICES areas. This makes it impossible for ICES to use fishing mortality, Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and other standard reference points for eel. As data on eel fisheries and other anthropogenic impacts remain incomplete, the assessment is based on time series for glass eel and yellow eel recruitment. Even without defined biological limit reference points, it is ICES’s assessment that the European eel population remains well below any potential reference points, such as Blim. [4] ICES has advised that all anthropogenic mortality should be kept as close to zero as possible since 2003 (ICES, 2020). Since 2021, the advice has changed to zero for all anthropogenic mortalities, including all fishing. [5] A Council Regulation (1100/2007) establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel was agreed in 2007. Since then, almost 20 years after its adoption, no notable recovery has been observed in the European eel population. [6] Only three EU countries – Ireland, Malta and Slovenia – have prohibited all fishing for the European eel , despite the fact that it is also on the European Red List of Freshwater Fishes. Six EU countries still landed over 100 tonnes in 2025 : the Netherlands (428 t), France (361 t), Germany [extrapolated from latest reported landings of >200 t], Denmark (126 t), Poland (120 t) and Sweden (114 t). Outside of the EU, Turkey (267 t) also reported landings over 100 tonnes. Egypt, which has a substantial fishery for European eel and mainly targets yellow and silver eel, does not report any data to ICES and is not included in the overall estimates. [7] Trends in landings – reported commercial landings of yellow and silver eel continue to fall overall. In 2024, landings were 2,074 tonnes and in 2025, landings were around 1,922 tonnes, if we assume that Germany landed >200 tonnes based on landings from recent years. However, France and Denmark stand out in 2025 for increasing reported commercial landings compared to the previous year, and the Netherlands for significantly increasing landings since the EU eel regulation was adopted. [8] EU glass eel landings – in 2026, reported commercial landings of glass eel, a fishery completely dominated by France, were at 53 tonnes. In France, landings have been increasing since 2011 with a peak at 54.5 tonnes in 2022. This year, France reported landings of 48.3 tonnes (prel. figures) – 91% of the EU catch. After Brexit, UK landings have fallen dramatically, from more than 3 tonnes to 0.6 tonnes in 2025. Spain is the only country still fishing for glass eel in the Mediterranean, and the Mediterranean landings almost doubled in 2026. [9] Recreational landings of yellow and silver eel are completely dominated by Germany. Total r eported recreational landings for 2022 – the last year with complete figures – was 550 tonnes. In Germany, recreational landings remain very high , higher than reported commercial landings, with 275 tonnes reported for 2022. This is over half of all reported recreational landings in the EU (52%). [10] Restocking involves catching wild glass eels in one place and letting them go in another, often spreading viruses and disease in the process. It has been used for decades in many countries – not as a conservation measure but in order to sustain fisheries for eel. Despite the prolonged practice, no net benefit to eel reproduction has been proven. In its advice for 2026, ICES notes that “restocking is reliant on a glass eel catch, which is in contradiction with the current advice”. [11] Eels have a complex life cycle , going through several different life stages and generally live for 10–20 years. The very small, translucent eels arriving at European coastlines every year are called glass eels . When they reach brackish or fresh waters, they transform into less transparent elvers , and then grow into yellow eels , which live along our coasts, in rivers and lakes for up to 25 years. When mature, they transform again into silver eels , which will undertake the long journey to the Sargasso Sea to spawn.
By CCB • November 5, 2026
Brussels, 4 November 2026: Environmental NGOs welcome the European Commission’s decision to not include a revision of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) in its 2027 Workplan, announced today, and call on the Commission to maintain this course. To improve ocean health and biodiversity, BirdLife, BLOOM, Coalition Clean Baltic, ClientEarth, Environmental Justice Foundation, Oceana, and Seas At Risk urge the Commission to prioritise full implementation and enforcement of the existing CFP to rebuild fish populations, protect marine ecosystems, and secure a sustainable future for fishers and coastal communities. “The Commission has rightly chosen to follow the findings of its own CFP evaluation , published in April this year, and to focus on holding Member States accountable for implementing the law”, said the NGOs. “Reopening a policy that has not yet reached its full potential would halt timely implementation, waste valuable time and delay the meaningful action that European fishers and marine ecosystems urgently need.” A competitive and resilient fisheries sector can only be built on: healthy fish populations; a system that gives a fair share of space and resources to fishers that have a low impact on the marine ecosystem; and a fleet that is enabled to make a just transition to lower environmental impact, reducing dependence on subsidised fossil fuels, and responding properly to the climate crisis. The CFP outlines a precautionary pathway forward, centering fisheries management on scientific advice and ecosystem protection, minimising the impact of fishing on the marine environment while aiming to provide a sustainably sourced food source for people throughout Europe. “The European Commission must now demonstrate its political ambition by delivering on the CFP, which will allow fish populations to recover, will help achieve food security, along with the wellbeing of European fishers and coastal communities, and protect ocean health”, said the NGOs. “With imminent annual fisheries negotiations between the Commission, Member States and third countries, including the UK and Norway, this will be a key opportunity to finally close a major CFP implementation gap by setting fishing limits that are geared towards rebuilding struggling fish populations and fisheries.” The environmental NGOs call on member states to cooperate with the European Commission on stronger implementation measures to fulfil the objectives of the CFP, and put European citizens and environment at the heart of their position going forward.