Joint NGO recommendations on Baltic Sea fishing opportunities for 2026

CCB • June 17, 2025

On Wednesday, 28 May, the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) published its scientific advice for fish stocks in the Baltic Sea. In response, environmental NGOs from around the Baltic Sea region urge the European Commission to propose, and fisheries ministers to adopt, fishing opportunities at levels well below the headline advice to safeguard ecosystem needs and dynamics and allow for rapid recovery of Baltic Sea fish populations.

The poor status and decline of many Baltic Sea fish populations have been thoroughly documented over several decades, indicating that the entire ecosystem is in great distress. So far, policy interventions have not reversed, or even halted, the negative trend concerning most of these populations.


Fish populations that once formed the cornerstone of the Baltic Sea fishery, such as the eastern and western Baltic cod and the western Baltic herring are now doing so poorly that the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) is advising zero catch for these stocks. Yet, even with the targeted fishery being closed for some years now, none of these three stocks are showing sufficient signs of recovery.


The condition (such as weight-at-age) of many flatfish populations, such as plaice, also raises alarm bells. The salmon spawning migration has fallen short of the target level in the past two years. As a result, even the healthiest salmon stocks are now unlikely to produce enough smolts corresponding to sustainable levels in the coming years. Even in cases where populations show minor signs of anticipated increased biomass, such as the Baltic sprat, these presumed increases are tied to a number of scientific uncertainties.


Disregarding the scientific uncertainties, and the warning signals that scientists have been pointing out for years, will have devastating consequences for the ecosystem and those who depend on it. Political will and ambition is needed to improve current fisheries management in the Baltic Sea to address the crisis facing its fish populations and the broader marine ecosystem.


In our briefing, we provide joint NGO recommendations regarding fishing opportunities for 2026, prioritising long-term ecosystem health and sustainable fisheries management over short-term economic interests. The recommendations are based on the ICES advice, the requirements of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the Baltic Multiannual Plan (MAP) to apply the precautionary approach and implement an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management, and the objective of achieving Good Environmental Status (GES) under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD).


The  current ICES advice on fishing opportunities - and the requests (by fishery managers like the European Commission) that guide the provision of such advice - do not fully reflect all relevant legal requirements and policy objectives applicable to the EU.

Concretely, they are not geared towards:


1. Recovering fish populations within a concrete timeframe and maintaining them above sustainable levels in the near future;
2. Preventing fish populations from, or minimising the risk of, falling outside safe biological limits, despite legal safeguards in the EU’s MAPs, including the Baltic Sea MAP; or
3. Delivering on all relevant elements of “Good Environmental Status” (GES) under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), such as healthy population structures and/or food web integrity (e.g. leaving enough food in the sea for other marine life).


EU decision-makers must urgently work with ICES to recognise and address these fundamental
shortcomings in the advisory approach, and apply additional precaution by setting fishing opportunities below the ICES headline advice, until the necessary changes have been made.
Fishing at or above advised MSY-based catch levels will not set the Baltic Sea on a clear
path out of the
crisis. We need a management system, underpinned by fully recovery-focused, precautionary and ecosystem-based advice, that goes beyond short-term fishing interests, and instead protects ecosystem functions, fisheries and coastal communities, in the long term.


To improve the scientific advice underpinning fishing opportunities, NGOs recommend that the European Commission should:


● Work with ICES and other relevant ICES advice clients to develop and implement a clear roadmap for how current shortcomings will be swiftly addressed and dealt with when setting fishing opportunities.


● Work with other relevant decision-makers to agree on ecosystem-based fisheries management objectives to inform the ICES advice request process. International commitments on biodiversity conservation, such as Global Biodiversity Framework Directive, Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) of HELCOM Commission as well as the MSFD should provide a basis for these ecological objectives and be considered alongside the rules and objectives of the CFP.


● Change the requests for ICES advice on fishing opportunities to:


a) aim for rapid recovery of fish populations, particularly depleted or at-risk stocks, within a concrete timeframe and for maintaining them above sustainable levels in the near future,
b) prevent or minimise the risk of fish populations falling outside safe biological limits, in line with the legal safeguard in the Baltic MAP to keep the risk of stocks falling below B
lim below 5%,
c) fully reflect ecosystem dynamics and needs and multispecies considerations, also delivering on all relevant elements of Good Environmental Status (GES) under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), such as healthy population structures and/or food web integrity (i.e. leaving enough food in the sea for other marine life), in line with an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management, and
d) provide sufficiently precautionary alternative catch options where a full incorporation of these aspects is not yet possible, to minimise risks to stocks and the overall ecosystem.


We urge the European Commission to propose, and fisheries ministers to adopt, fishing
opportunities at levels well below the F
MSY point value, where available, to allow for the rapid
recovery of Baltic Sea fish populations. This would ensure sufficient precaution, and safeguard
long-term population and ecosystem health, resilience and productivity.


Read the full Joint NGO recommendations on Baltic Sea fishing opportunities for 2026 here.

Photos by IISD/ENB - Natalia Mroz
By CCB July 2, 2025
The first meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on the Global Framework on Chemicals (GFC) was held in Punta del Este, Uruguay, from 23–27 June 2025 , bringing together government representatives, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, including the Coalition Clean Baltic representative, the private sector, youth, and academia. This marked the first global gathering since the GFC was adopted at the Fifth International Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM5) in 2023. The primary focus of OEWG-1 was to take stock of progress since ICCM5 and to discuss how best to operationalize the framework’s goals. Participants exchanged views on implementation needs and priorities, as well as preparatory work for the first International conference of GFC , expected in 2026. Advancing Implementation Programmes Across Key Sectors A central discussion point was the development of terms of reference (ToR) for three Implementation Programmes under the GFC. One of these programmes will include sector-specific sub-programmes , aiming to promote safer chemicals management practices in industries such as electronics, textiles, health care, and construction . The intent is to support sector-wide engagement, innovation, and accountability in reducing chemical risks. Delegates also addressed the selection and future treatment of chemical Issues of Concern (IoCs) - substances or groups of substances that require global attention, e.g. lead in paints, highly hazardous pesticides, environmentally persistent pharmaceutical pollutants , and others) . While there was broad support for retaining all currently recognized IoCs, discussions highlighted the need for clear criteria, dedicated workplans, and adequate resourcing to ensure each IoC is actively addressed rather than left unresolved. Financing as a Cornerstone of Effective Implementation Discussions made clear that successful implementation of the GFC will require adequate, sustained, and predictable financial resources . The meeting explored the operation of the GFC Fund , with particular attention to how it might be improved to ensure equitable access to financial resources , especially for low- and middle-income countries. Ideas for a resource mobilization strategy were also shared, with many participants emphasizing the importance of sustained public and private sector contributions. There was significant support for applying the “polluter pays” principle , ensuring that industries contributing to chemical pollution take financial responsibility for managing its impacts. The intersessional work ahead of COP1 will be critical for shaping a robust financing mechanism that matches the framework’s ambition. Global Alliance on Highly Hazardous Pesticides launched A major milestone from the meeting was the launch of the Global Alliance on Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) . This new initiative aims to promote international collaboration, knowledge exchange, and support for safer alternatives, including agroecological approaches that reduce reliance on harmful substances in agriculture. Regional Perspectives: Implications for the Baltic Sea “ For the Baltic Sea region , chemicals management remains a critical environmental and public health issue ”, commented Eugeniy Lobanov, Leader of the Hazardous Substances Working Area at Coalition Clean Baltic . “ Implementation of the GFC provides an opportunity to reinforce regional actions under the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan , especially concerning the reduction of hazardous substances entering the marine environment, e.g., pharmaceutical pollutants ”. It is important that Baltic Sea countries actively contribute to the GFC’s development and ensure regional priorities are reflected in global strategies. To read summary report of OEWG 1 . *** Article written by Eugeniy Lobanov, CCB Hazardous Substances Working Area Leader Photos by IISD/ENB - Natalia Mroz
By CCB June 3, 2025
- More than 200 environmental organisations worldwide demand immediate ban on offshore oil and gas exploration to protect marine ecosystems - Coalition urges world leaders to commit to transformative ocean protection measures at UN Ocean Conference 2025 - Open letter highlights critical window for action as Ocean faces unprecedented threats from climate change, pollution and biodiversity loss