COP30 brings ocean and water to the center of climate policy

CCB • December 5, 2025

In Belém, in the heart of the Amazon, the 2025 UN Climate Change Conference COP30 immediately set the bar high. In his opening speech, Brazilian President Lula da Silva stressed that climate change is no longer a "threat to the future", but a tragedy that the world is already experiencing here and now, and called on countries to accelerate actions rather than limit themselves to promises.


However, as is often the case in COP meetings, the political reality turned out to be more complicated than ambitions. Negotiations were difficult: the countries could not agree on a clear and binding plan to phase out fossil fuels. It is important to note that the Global Action Plan has provided a platform for discussing the development of a roadmap for phasing out fossil fuels, the main driver of climate change. At the same time, COP30 has brought tangible progress in other areas: the countries agreed to triple the amount of adaptation funding for developing countries by 2035, strengthened the forest and ocean agenda, and expanded the range of practical initiatives under the Action Agenda. COP30 consolidated the trend: from "water at the center of the climate crisis" to a holistic ocean agenda closely related to energy, food, biodiversity and sustainable coastal development.


From the COP29 Water Declaration to the COP30 Enhanced Ocean Water Program

At COP29 in Baku, the Declaration on Water for Climate Action was adopted, with the aim to applying comprehensive approaches to combating the causes and consequences of climate change for water basins, emphasizing also the need to integrate water-related mitigation and adaptation measures into national climate policies, including Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and National Adaptation Plans (NAPs).

COP30 did not reverse this logic, but expanded it towards the ocean and coasts. Both processes "aquatic" and "oceanic" are moving in the same direction: 

  • integration of water, coasts and ocean into the climate plans of countries;
  • development of nature-based solutions;
  • strengthening transboundary management of water and marine systems;
  • recognizing adaptation as an equal part of climate policy, rather than an "adjunct" to emissions reduction.


Task Force on Oceans and the Blue NDC Challenge


The international
Task Force on Oceans, led by Brazil and France, was officially presented at the high-level ministerial meeting "From Ambition to Implementation: Delivering on Ocean Commitments" on 18 November, integrating oceans into a global mechanism to accelerate the incorporation of marine solutions into national climate plans.

The Blue Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) Challenge encourages countries to set ocean protection targets when updating their NDCs. The goal is to transition the Blue NDC Challenge into an Implementation Task Force. Members of the Blue NDC Challenge, currently 17 countries, can adopt a broad set of actions aimed at the protection and sustainable use of the oceans.These measures include the sustainable management, conservation, and restoration of coastal and marine ecosystems, supported by tools  such as marine spatial planning, integrated coastal zone management, and climate-aligned marine protected areas. Countries are also encouraged to support sustainable and climate-resilient fishing and aquaculture, ensuring ocean health and long-term food security.


Brazil has set a clear example: its updated NDC includes a separate chapter on the ocean and coastal zones. For the first time, the national climate plan (Plano Clima) until 2035 includes a thematic adaptation plan for these areas. Priorities include the completion of national Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) by 2030 and major programs for the conservation and restoration of mangroves and coral reefs (ProManguezal, ProCoral).

Blue Package and «Ocean Breakthroughs»


The Blue Package, part of the COP30 Action Agenda, provides a roadmap for how countries can:

  • Protect and restore coastal and marine ecosystems;
  • Integrate marine solutions into climate mitigation and adaptation;
  • Scale marine protected areas aligned with climate goals;
  • Deploy tools such as marine spatial planning (MSP) and integrated coastal zone management.

This is the first time an Action Agenda includes a dedicated ocean implementation track. It builds on the Ocean Breakthroughs, which are science-based "breakthroughs" formulated up to 2030 in five interconnected sectors:


Marine Conservation: by 2030, investments of at least USD 72 billion secure the integrity of ocean ecosystems by protecting, restoring, and conserving at least 30% of the ocean for the benefit of people, climate, and nature;


Ocean Renewable Energy: by 2030, at least 380 GW of offshore capacity should be installed, while establishing targets and enabling measures for net-positive biodiversity outcomes. USD 10 billion in concessional finance is advocated for developing economies to reach its goal.


Shipping: by 2030, zero emission fuels make up at least 5%of international shipping fuels (aiming for 10%) and 15% of domestic shipping fuels. 450,000 seafarers need upskilling and retraining, and 30% of trade should move through climate adapting ports. The impact of international shipping on marine biodiversity should be reduced by 30%.


Aquatic Food: by 2030, at least USD 4 billion per year will support resilient aquatic food systems that contribute to healthy, regenerative ecosystems and sustain food,and nutrition security for three billion people;


Coastal Tourism: by 2030, USD 30 billion per year should be  invested to halve emissions from coastal tourism. Additional investments are planned to build the resilience of local communities and to recover and protect ecosystems, supporting  sustainable tourism in island and coastal destinations most vulnerable to climate change.


Practical tools for achieving these goals were also launched at COP30:

  • Ocean Breakthroughs Implementation Dashboard is a public dashboard to monitor the progress of countries and industries in five areas (nature conservation, marine food, renewable energy, shipping, tourism);
  • Marine Biodiversity & The Ocean Health toolkit is a set of standards and methodologies for assessing the state of the ocean and integrating ocean based solutions into NDC/NAP (including ocean health indicators, recommendations for monitoring biodiversity, and templates for accounting and reporting).


Together, these tools enhance accountability and transparency, making it more difficult for countries to "speak beautifully" about the ocean without taking measurable actions.


One Ocean Partnership and Belém Ocean Declaration


The One Ocean Partnership is another framework initiative reinforced at COP30. It unites states, scientific organizations, NGOs and businesses around large-scale programs for the restoration and protection of marine ecosystems. By 2030, the partnership aims to mobilize at least $20 billion for the restoration of marine ecosystems, create up to 20 million jobs in coastal regions, accelerate the implementation of ocean-based solutions in national climate policies.


The Belém Ocean Declaration was presented at the Ocean Pavilion, calling on countries to:

  • Recognize the ocean as a central climate regulator and integrate it into national and global climate strategies;
  • Ensure accessibility and equity of ocean solutions, prioritizing small island states, least developed countries and coastal communities;
  • Accelerate ocean and coastal conservation by linking itto mitigation, adaptation, and sustainability goals;
  • Develop threat-monitoring technologies (e.g. sea level rise, acidification, biodiversity loss) and create reliable MRV (monitoring, reporting and verification) systems for ocean solutions;
  • Support global ocean surveillance and mapping systems.


 The declaration sets the political framework that underpins the practical goals and tools of the Blue Package and Ocean Breakthroughs.

At COP30, environmental organizations and scientific institutions also  raised concerns about  threats to the ocean that remain outside formal solutions. One of the key issues was deep-sea mining: NGOs warned about the risks of destroying unique deep-sea ecosystems and emphasized that commercial mining should not proceed without scientific data on its climatic and environmental consequences. Although COP30 did not make  formal decisions on deep-sea mining or restrictions on commercial fishing, pressure from NGOs, scientists, and coastal communities is growing, shaping global demand for stronger ocean protection in future climate negotiations.


Strengths of the COP30 water and ocean agenda

  • The ocean has been systematically integrated into climate instruments for the first time, including NDCs, the Action Agenda, and various coalitions and partnerships;
  • The Blue Package and Ocean Breakthroughs set specific benchmarks for sectoral goals, financing, and monitoring; 
  • New financial and institutional mechanisms are emerging, such as the Blue NDC Challenge, One Ocean Partnership, and ocean-focused parts of the Action Agenda, supporting national and regional blue projects.


Gaps and challenges

  • Most oceanic initiatives remain voluntary and are embedded in  binding COP decisions;
  • There is still no strong language in COP texts on limiting oil and gas production on the continental shelf or in deep-sea areas;
  • Freshwater ecosystems (rivers, lakes, reservoirs) receive noticeably less attention than ocean and forests, leaving the water agenda somewhat  "blurred" across forest, biodiversity, and Amazonian themes.


In summary, COP30 has significantly advanced the institutionalization of the ocean in climate policy, but has not addressed  the key political issue of the rapid,mandatory phase-outof fossil fuels. Without this, any "blue" agenda risks being compensatory rather than transformational.


The COP30 water agenda reinforces the integration of  seas and coasts intoclimate policy. For the Baltic States, this means coastal ecosystems will increasingly be included in national adaptation plans and climate strategies as natural protection against storms, erosion and sea level rise.


COP30 initiatives such as the Blue NDC Challenge, Blue Package, and One Ocean Partnership create the political and financial framework for scaling coastal ecosystem restoration projects. This opens  opportunities for projects aimed at strengthening coastal resilience, monitoring sea conditions, and implementing nature-based solutions. As a result, the COP30 water agenda creates both pressure and incentives to accelerate climate adaptation in the Baltic and highlight the need for more funding for "blue" and coastal projects.


***
Article written by Anna Ushakova, CCB Maritime Working Area Leader


By CCB • October 27, 2026
27 October 2026 , Luxembourg - EU fisheries ministers increased central Baltic and Bothnian herring catch limits beyond the European Commission’s proposals and significantly increased the sprat catch limit, falling short of the precaution needed to protect the role of herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea food web. The Council also rejected proposed cuts to accidental catches of severely depleted cod and western Baltic herring populations. NGOs warn that fishing limits remain too high and urge EU ministers to follow the agreement with concrete plans to rebuild depleted fish populations. Herring: further measures needed to safeguard fragile recovery and protect vulnerable populations EU fisheries ministers increased the catch limit for central Baltic herring to 165 228 tonnes, a 71% increase compared with 2026. The population has shown signs of improvement after years of depletion. However, the central Baltic herring population remains vulnerable, and rebuilding must restore healthy age and size structures as well as overall abundance. Although below the scientific headline catch advice, the Council’s decision exceeds the Commission’s proposal, which was more precautionary and recovery-oriented and should have been followed by the ministers. “Ministers have recognised the need for caution, but still allowed more herring to be caught than the Commission proposed. These vulnerable populations need a stronger chance of lasting recovery, with clear rebuilding targets, a timetable for reaching them and measures that are implemented and enforced ,” said Cathrine Pedersen Schirmer, Senior Fisheries Policy Advisor at Coalition Clean Baltic. For Bothnian herring , ministers retained the three-month spawning closure but increased the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) by 12% , despite the population remaining below healthy levels. The Commission’s proposed TAC for this fish population was already a compromise between population rebuilding and maintaining fishing opportunities. The agreed higher TAC poses a risk to the recovery of the Bothnian herring population and creates increasing uncertainty for the industry. “ Fisheries decisions must also account for the risks to fish population recovery. Even catch limits within the ICES advice range can leave stocks at risk of remaining below the biomass levels that should trigger recovery measures. Fishing opportunities must give depleted populations a real chance to recover to healthy level s,” said Beatrice Rindevall, Chairperson of the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. The Gulf of Riga herring TAC was also set above NGOs’ recommendations, with an increase of 11% compared with 2026, despite the recent decline in its spawning biomass and its importance to the Baltic food web. Lower limits for this fish population would have better supported population health and long-term resilience. Sprat: recovery must extend to the Baltic Sea food web The sprat agreement remains a significant concern. The Council’s decision, in line with the Commission’s proposal, to increase the sprat catch limit by 44% to 291 590 tonnes exceeds the level NGOs recommended. Although the population has increased, the agreed limit does not sufficiently account for sprat’s importance as prey for cod, salmon, seabirds and other marine wildlife, persistent catch misreporting or the risk of catching vulnerable herring alongside sprat. “ Herring and sprat are vital to the Baltic Sea ecosystem. When setting fishing opportunities, decision makers must leave enough prey in the water to support predators like cod and salmon, to rebuild ecosystem health and align with the EU’s nature restoration ambitions ,” said Justyna Zajchowska, Fisheries Lead for WWF Baltic Sea Programme. Salmon: no increase in catch limits, but stronger protection needed NGOs welcome the decision not to increase salmon fishing opportunities. However, fishing should be restricted to compensatory hatchery-released salmon or salmon from rivers where populations are at full reproductive capacity. Fishing on vulnerable wild populations must be avoided and, if returning salmon numbers are insufficient, additional adaptive management measures should be deployed immediately, considering the impact of recent poor spawning runs. “ Good returns to some large rivers are encouraging, but they do not demonstrate recovery across the Baltic region. Many smaller river populations remain in serious difficulty. We need fishing restrictions that protect those vulnerable salmon throughout their migration and allow enough fish to reach their spawning grounds ,” said Thomas Johansson, Chairman of Östersjölaxälvar i Samverkan and Secretary General of the Baltic Salmon Fund. Cod, western Baltic herring and plaice: Council misses opportunity to curb bycatch Both Baltic cod populations and western Baltic herring remain severely depleted. Targeted cod fisheries remain closed, while ministers retained the small-scale fisheries exemption for western Baltic herring. Yet ministers agreed bycatch quotas well above the Commission’s proposals for 2027 and at the same level as 2026, falling short of the protection sought by NGOs. For all three populations, the agreed bycatch quotas permit continued catches despite ICES advice for zero catch. The Council’s decision to increase the plaice TAC to 11,237 tonnes , well above the level NGOs recommended, missed an opportunity to secure a reduction in accidental cod catches. The decision also does not reflect the very low reported landings of this species. Declining weight and condition of plaice also warrant greater caution. The TAC must be combined with effective enforcement of mandatory selective gear to reduce cod bycatch and the implementation of the landing obligation. Annual fishing limits must support lasting recovery The Council’s decisions on Baltic Sea fishing opportunities for 2027 are not ambitious enough to secure restoration of all Baltic Sea fish populations. These decisions should be seen in the context of last year’s joint commitment by the European Commission and Baltic Sea Member States to seek dedicated scientific advice from ICES on rebuilding pathways for fish populations. In the absence of such rebuilding-oriented advice, and whilst we are waiting for it, decisions should be more cautious and based on the available recovery-focused catch options provided by the scientists in their traditional advice. Fisheries management must also support EU marine restoration objectives and the achievement of good environmental status in the Baltic Sea. Restoring fish populations and food webs is essential to the recovery of the sea itself and to the long-term future of Baltic fisheries and the coastal communities that depend on them. ENDS *** Further information: Link to Council decision Link to Commission’s proposal Link to Joint NGO recommendations on Baltic Sea fishing opportunities for 2027 Media contact: Beatrice Rindevall, Chairperson, Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, ordforande@naturskyddsforeningen.se Cathrine Pedersen Schirmer , Senior Fisheries Policy Advisor, Coalition Clean Baltic, Cathrine@ccb.se Justyna Zajchowska , Fisheries Lead, WWF Baltic Sea Programme, jzajchowska@wwf.pl Dr. Katja Hockun, Senior Expert Meeresschutz, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., hockun@duh.de Konrad Stralka , Executive Director, BalticWaters, konrad.stralka@balticwaters.org Magda Jentgena , Baltic Sea and Freshwater Programme Manager, Pasaules Dabas Fonds, mjentgena@pdf.lv Regan McEnroe , Chairperson, Nature and Youth Sweden, ordforande@faltbiologerna.se Tapani Veistola, Executive Director, Suomen luonnonsuojeluliitto (Finnish Association for Nature Conservation), tapani.veistola@sll.fi Thomas Johansson , Chairman, Östersjölaxälvar i Samverkan, and Secretary General, Baltic Salmon Fund, thomas@balticsalmonfund.com .
By CCB • August 31, 2026
Uppsala, 31 August 2026 - Coalition Clean Baltic (CCB) welcomes the Commission’s recognition that declining fishing pressure has not consistently delivered higher biomass, that recruitment and biomass are deteriorating for a number of stocks, and that Baltic fisheries urgently need rebuilding trajectories. These findings must now shape the Council’s decision on the 2027 fishing opportunities and the Commission’s position during the Council negotiations. The poor status and decline of many Baltic Sea fish populations have been documented over several decades and show that the ecosystem is in severe distress. Cumulative human pressures have contributed to major ecosystem shifts, and at the same time climate change is making the shallow, semi-enclosed Baltic Sea warmer and less saline. These combined pressures affect not only fish biomass but also recruitment, population age and size structures, species interactions and the functioning of the wider food web. The Baltic crisis reflects the persistent failure to fully implement the CFP and the Baltic MAP, including their precautionary safeguards and the legal obligation to apply ecosystem-based fisheries management. Fishing opportunities for 2027 must therefore mark the first concrete step towards ambitious, timebound rebuilding trajectories that reduce fishing pressure and enable depleted populations to recover to healthy levels. These trajectories must include implementation of an ecosystem based approach by accounting for species interactions, food-web needs, habitat conditions, environmental and climatic change and scientific uncertainty, while reinforcing, not replacing the CFP’s objectives and the Baltic MAP’s existing safeguards in Art. 4.6. The Commission’s 2027 proposal is now before the Council. The October Council must turn the commitment to rebuild Baltic fish populations into measurable action by adopting fishing opportunities that deliver rapid and sustained recovery. Under no circumstances should the TACs adopted be higher than levels proposed by the European Commission. Fishing opportunities aligned with scientific evidence, legal safeguards and ecosystem needs are the basis for both a recovering Baltic Sea and viable fisheries in the long term. Read the full CCB's submission and recommendations here .