COP30 brings ocean and water to the center of climate policy

CCB • December 5, 2025

In Belém, in the heart of the Amazon, the 2025 UN Climate Change Conference COP30 immediately set the bar high. In his opening speech, Brazilian President Lula da Silva stressed that climate change is no longer a "threat to the future", but a tragedy that the world is already experiencing here and now, and called on countries to accelerate actions rather than limit themselves to promises.


However, as is often the case in COP meetings, the political reality turned out to be more complicated than ambitions. Negotiations were difficult: the countries could not agree on a clear and binding plan to phase out fossil fuels. It is important to note that the Global Action Plan has provided a platform for discussing the development of a roadmap for phasing out fossil fuels, the main driver of climate change. At the same time, COP30 has brought tangible progress in other areas: the countries agreed to triple the amount of adaptation funding for developing countries by 2035, strengthened the forest and ocean agenda, and expanded the range of practical initiatives under the Action Agenda. COP30 consolidated the trend: from "water at the center of the climate crisis" to a holistic ocean agenda closely related to energy, food, biodiversity and sustainable coastal development.


From the COP29 Water Declaration to the COP30 Enhanced Ocean Water Program

At COP29 in Baku, the Declaration on Water for Climate Action was adopted, with the aim to applying comprehensive approaches to combating the causes and consequences of climate change for water basins, emphasizing also the need to integrate water-related mitigation and adaptation measures into national climate policies, including Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and National Adaptation Plans (NAPs).

COP30 did not reverse this logic, but expanded it towards the ocean and coasts. Both processes "aquatic" and "oceanic" are moving in the same direction: 

  • integration of water, coasts and ocean into the climate plans of countries;
  • development of nature-based solutions;
  • strengthening transboundary management of water and marine systems;
  • recognizing adaptation as an equal part of climate policy, rather than an "adjunct" to emissions reduction.


Task Force on Oceans and the Blue NDC Challenge


The international
Task Force on Oceans, led by Brazil and France, was officially presented at the high-level ministerial meeting "From Ambition to Implementation: Delivering on Ocean Commitments" on 18 November, integrating oceans into a global mechanism to accelerate the incorporation of marine solutions into national climate plans.

The Blue Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) Challenge encourages countries to set ocean protection targets when updating their NDCs. The goal is to transition the Blue NDC Challenge into an Implementation Task Force. Members of the Blue NDC Challenge, currently 17 countries, can adopt a broad set of actions aimed at the protection and sustainable use of the oceans.These measures include the sustainable management, conservation, and restoration of coastal and marine ecosystems, supported by tools  such as marine spatial planning, integrated coastal zone management, and climate-aligned marine protected areas. Countries are also encouraged to support sustainable and climate-resilient fishing and aquaculture, ensuring ocean health and long-term food security.


Brazil has set a clear example: its updated NDC includes a separate chapter on the ocean and coastal zones. For the first time, the national climate plan (Plano Clima) until 2035 includes a thematic adaptation plan for these areas. Priorities include the completion of national Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) by 2030 and major programs for the conservation and restoration of mangroves and coral reefs (ProManguezal, ProCoral).

Blue Package and «Ocean Breakthroughs»


The Blue Package, part of the COP30 Action Agenda, provides a roadmap for how countries can:

  • Protect and restore coastal and marine ecosystems;
  • Integrate marine solutions into climate mitigation and adaptation;
  • Scale marine protected areas aligned with climate goals;
  • Deploy tools such as marine spatial planning (MSP) and integrated coastal zone management.

This is the first time an Action Agenda includes a dedicated ocean implementation track. It builds on the Ocean Breakthroughs, which are science-based "breakthroughs" formulated up to 2030 in five interconnected sectors:


Marine Conservation: by 2030, investments of at least USD 72 billion secure the integrity of ocean ecosystems by protecting, restoring, and conserving at least 30% of the ocean for the benefit of people, climate, and nature;


Ocean Renewable Energy: by 2030, at least 380 GW of offshore capacity should be installed, while establishing targets and enabling measures for net-positive biodiversity outcomes. USD 10 billion in concessional finance is advocated for developing economies to reach its goal.


Shipping: by 2030, zero emission fuels make up at least 5%of international shipping fuels (aiming for 10%) and 15% of domestic shipping fuels. 450,000 seafarers need upskilling and retraining, and 30% of trade should move through climate adapting ports. The impact of international shipping on marine biodiversity should be reduced by 30%.


Aquatic Food: by 2030, at least USD 4 billion per year will support resilient aquatic food systems that contribute to healthy, regenerative ecosystems and sustain food,and nutrition security for three billion people;


Coastal Tourism: by 2030, USD 30 billion per year should be  invested to halve emissions from coastal tourism. Additional investments are planned to build the resilience of local communities and to recover and protect ecosystems, supporting  sustainable tourism in island and coastal destinations most vulnerable to climate change.


Practical tools for achieving these goals were also launched at COP30:

  • Ocean Breakthroughs Implementation Dashboard is a public dashboard to monitor the progress of countries and industries in five areas (nature conservation, marine food, renewable energy, shipping, tourism);
  • Marine Biodiversity & The Ocean Health toolkit is a set of standards and methodologies for assessing the state of the ocean and integrating ocean based solutions into NDC/NAP (including ocean health indicators, recommendations for monitoring biodiversity, and templates for accounting and reporting).


Together, these tools enhance accountability and transparency, making it more difficult for countries to "speak beautifully" about the ocean without taking measurable actions.


One Ocean Partnership and Belém Ocean Declaration


The One Ocean Partnership is another framework initiative reinforced at COP30. It unites states, scientific organizations, NGOs and businesses around large-scale programs for the restoration and protection of marine ecosystems. By 2030, the partnership aims to mobilize at least $20 billion for the restoration of marine ecosystems, create up to 20 million jobs in coastal regions, accelerate the implementation of ocean-based solutions in national climate policies.


The Belém Ocean Declaration was presented at the Ocean Pavilion, calling on countries to:

  • Recognize the ocean as a central climate regulator and integrate it into national and global climate strategies;
  • Ensure accessibility and equity of ocean solutions, prioritizing small island states, least developed countries and coastal communities;
  • Accelerate ocean and coastal conservation by linking itto mitigation, adaptation, and sustainability goals;
  • Develop threat-monitoring technologies (e.g. sea level rise, acidification, biodiversity loss) and create reliable MRV (monitoring, reporting and verification) systems for ocean solutions;
  • Support global ocean surveillance and mapping systems.


 The declaration sets the political framework that underpins the practical goals and tools of the Blue Package and Ocean Breakthroughs.

At COP30, environmental organizations and scientific institutions also  raised concerns about  threats to the ocean that remain outside formal solutions. One of the key issues was deep-sea mining: NGOs warned about the risks of destroying unique deep-sea ecosystems and emphasized that commercial mining should not proceed without scientific data on its climatic and environmental consequences. Although COP30 did not make  formal decisions on deep-sea mining or restrictions on commercial fishing, pressure from NGOs, scientists, and coastal communities is growing, shaping global demand for stronger ocean protection in future climate negotiations.


Strengths of the COP30 water and ocean agenda

  • The ocean has been systematically integrated into climate instruments for the first time, including NDCs, the Action Agenda, and various coalitions and partnerships;
  • The Blue Package and Ocean Breakthroughs set specific benchmarks for sectoral goals, financing, and monitoring; 
  • New financial and institutional mechanisms are emerging, such as the Blue NDC Challenge, One Ocean Partnership, and ocean-focused parts of the Action Agenda, supporting national and regional blue projects.


Gaps and challenges

  • Most oceanic initiatives remain voluntary and are embedded in  binding COP decisions;
  • There is still no strong language in COP texts on limiting oil and gas production on the continental shelf or in deep-sea areas;
  • Freshwater ecosystems (rivers, lakes, reservoirs) receive noticeably less attention than ocean and forests, leaving the water agenda somewhat  "blurred" across forest, biodiversity, and Amazonian themes.


In summary, COP30 has significantly advanced the institutionalization of the ocean in climate policy, but has not addressed  the key political issue of the rapid,mandatory phase-outof fossil fuels. Without this, any "blue" agenda risks being compensatory rather than transformational.


The COP30 water agenda reinforces the integration of  seas and coasts intoclimate policy. For the Baltic States, this means coastal ecosystems will increasingly be included in national adaptation plans and climate strategies as natural protection against storms, erosion and sea level rise.


COP30 initiatives such as the Blue NDC Challenge, Blue Package, and One Ocean Partnership create the political and financial framework for scaling coastal ecosystem restoration projects. This opens  opportunities for projects aimed at strengthening coastal resilience, monitoring sea conditions, and implementing nature-based solutions. As a result, the COP30 water agenda creates both pressure and incentives to accelerate climate adaptation in the Baltic and highlight the need for more funding for "blue" and coastal projects.


***
Article written by Anna Ushakova, CCB Maritime Working Area Leader


By CCB June 2, 2026
About CCB Coalition Clean Baltic – CCB is a politically independent network, uniting 28 environmental non-profit organizations, as well as partners and experts from 11 countries surrounding the Baltic Sea. The main goal of CCB is to promote the protection and improvement of the environment and natural resources of the Baltic Sea region by encouraging new and constructive approaches and engaging people to become part of the solution instead of part of the problem. CCB Secretariat is based in Uppsala, Sweden. Background The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) from 2021 includes a commitment to develop a regional action plan for habitat and biotope restoration by 2026. This plan is expected to: Define qualitative and quantitative restoration targets Establish a prioritized list of restoration actions Provide an implementation toolbox of best practices and methods The scope of the HELCOM action plan focuses exclusively on benthic habitats and biotopes , with particular emphasis on active restoration measures . Adoption of the plan is foreseen at the HELCOM Ministerial Meeting in November 2026. Coalition Clean Baltic (CCB) recognizes the importance of the HELCOM process but also the need to strengthen ambition, improve implementation guidance, consider a source-to-sea approach, and ensure long term ecological effectiveness . Therefore, a CCB Shadow Restoration Implementation Plan will complement and critically assess the HELCOM Restoration Action Plan. The purpose of the CCB Shadow Restoration Implementation Plan is to: Provide a science-based and practice-oriented complement to the HELCOM Restoration Action Plan Identify gaps, weaknesses, and missing elements in the HELCOM Restoration Action Plan Propose concrete, implementable actions, under a source-to-sea approach, to ensure effective restoration outcomes Strengthen alignment with the BSAP objectives and broader regional and EU policies Your Role You will compile the CCB Shadow Restoration Implementation Plan with aims to: 1. Assess the proposed HELCOM restoration measures , particularly their expected ecological impact by Reviewing proposed HELCOM actions for benthic habitats Evaluating whether actions are sufficient to achieve good environmental status Identifing missing measures, insufficient ambition, or unclear guidance 2. Define recommendations on how restoration should be implemented in practice including Required scale, intensity, and geographic coverage of actions Feasibility and effectiveness of active restoration methods 3. Propose additional actions and priorities , especially where the scope of the HELCOM action plan is insufficient, such as Integration of a source-to-sea approach for better ecological coherence Passive restoration measures Including actions on riverine systems (barrier removal, flow restoration) and coastal ecosystems (dunes, wetlands, lagoons) Incorporating important fish habitats and spawning/nursery areas, as well as ecosystem connectivity 4. Align HELCOM restoration efforts with other relevant policy frameworks , including the Baltic Sea Action Plan, Marine Action Plan, EU Biodiversity Strategy, Nature Restoration Regulation, Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Maritime Spatial Planning Directive, Water Framework Directive and Common Fisheries Policy. This is a Joint efforts with WWF Baltic Sea Programme The organisations, CCB and WWF Baltic Sea Program, will produce two separate documents with separate logos and will be presented at a joint side-event at the HELCOM Ministerial Meeting in November 2026. Actions for the Consultant/Expert & products to deliver The final document of the shadow restoration implementation plan Conduct interviews with all WA Leaders and MOs of CCB working on restoration to gather concrete input Share at the end all notes of the research and transcripts of interviews with MOs Bi-weekly call of consultant + CCB to check-in on progress, problems and next steps Publications/Sources CCB Restoration Guidelines https://irp.cdn-website.com/53007095/files/uploaded/CCB+Restoration+Guidelines_Update+October+2025.pdf CCB BSAP Shadow Plan: https://www.ccb.se/publication/Shadow%20Plan Profile A college degree, preferably in marine science, political science, environmental studies, social sciences, or a comparable field Experience in political campaigning, strategic communication, or advocacy, ideally in environmental, climate, nature, or marine conservation, preferably with an NGO Knowledge about relevant political settings and frameworks in the Baltic Sea (HELCOM, BSAP, MSFD, NRRL, ...) Experience in collaborating with coalitions, initiatives and civil society actors Initiative, independence and reliability working fully remotely Excellent written and spoken English are required Contract Terms Contract Type: can be structured as a consulting contract or a fixed-term employment (for candidates based in Sweden). We are open to discuss what works best depending on your situation. Time: From 15 June until 15 Oct 2026, at 50-75% work pace. Location: Remote position. Application Process: Should you be interested in applying for this position please send your CV (max. 2 pages) together with a personal letter (max. 1 page) before 9 June 2026 to: secretariat@ccb.se *** Being an international organization, CCB’s work is carried out in English. Applications submitted in any other language will not be considered. Incomplete applications (e.g. lacking either CV or personal letter) will be also not considered. We will be reviewing applications as they come in and encourage early applications. Only shortlisted candidates will be contacted. *** For inquiries , contact CCB Biodiversity Officer: andrea.cervantes@ccb.se Equal Opportunities CCB is an equal opportunity employer. In the application and hiring process, CCB will not discriminate against any individual based on race, colour, sex, language, religion, national or social origin, property, disability, age, family status, sexual orientation and gender identity, economic and social situation.
By CCB May 28, 2026
28 May 2026 - Baltic Sea herring stocks and the herring fisheries have in recent years become a central point of contention in Baltic Sea fisheries policy. Member States' approaches to the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) recommendations for herring quotas have varied, and the public debate around herring is polarised. At the same time, dialogue between groups of fishers and other stakeholders in different countries has been limited, and not all actors have had a clear picture of each other's perspectives and needs. Within the framework of the Fisheries for the Future project, funded by Ålandsbanken’s Baltic Sea Project, Finnish and Swedish fishers, environmental organisations and researchers gathered last autumn to discuss the status of herring stocks and fishing in the Baltic Sea. Participants gained a better understanding of differences between countries and areas regarding stock status, fisheries management and research. The organisations that took part in the workshop all agree on the need for joint dialogue and wish for the cooperation to continue. “ The project combines research and practical understanding of the herring situation in the Baltic Sea. That makes the initiative particularly important, as the lessons learned can contribute to better decisions and more accurate measures going forward ," notes Crista Hietala, Head of Marketing and Communications at Ålandsbanken and the Baltic Sea Project. During the workshop, a shared understanding emerged of the complexity of the issue, where fishing is one factor but not the only cause of the state of the stocks. The need for a holistic approach was emphasised, in which environmental changes and factors affecting fisheries regulation are considered alongside fishing itself. " Herring stocks are affected by a range of interacting factors – from water quality and salinity to changes in food webs and climate change. At the same time, knowledge about how these factors interact remains limited, which contributes to increased uncertainty in management ," says Aimi Hamberg, Marine Policy Officer at Coalition Clean Baltic. More stable quotas increase predictability The predictability and economic sustainability of fishing can be improved by reducing annual variations in fishing quotas. Multi-annual and more stable quotas would facilitate the planning of fishing operations and better secure the herring's central role in the Baltic Sea ecosystem. The fishing and environmental organisations that participated in the workshop propose that EU member states ask the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) to investigate how the quota system can be developed in a more stable and long-term direction, while at the same time ensuring the recovery of sustainable herring stocks. More knowledge about herring spawning areas Workshop participants emphasise that a significantly better knowledge base is needed about herring spawning and nursery areas than what we have today. Updated information on the most important reproduction areas for herring is central to marine spatial planning, for example when siting offshore wind power and other uses of sea areas. Towards ecosystem-based stock assessments During the workshop, it was recommended that herring stock assessments should be based on an ecosystem perspective. ” We believe that stock assessments and advice on fishing quotas need to take greater account of changes in central ecosystem factors, such as predation by seals and cormorants. It is important to expand data collection in order to achieve this ," say representatives of Vi Svenska Fiskare (We Swedish Fishers). As a first step, workshop participants recommend that Finland and Sweden initiate a joint regional project in the Gulf of Bothnia, which can later be extended to other parts of the Baltic Sea. Management areas should be reviewed – dialogue on protected areas needs to continue The workshop highlighted the need to review the division of management areas in the Baltic Sea. Participants propose that the Bothnian Sea and the Bothnian Bay be separated as distinct regulatory areas. This is motivated by genetic differences between the stocks and the fish's migration patterns. In addition, participants consider it important to continue the dialogue on possible protected areas in the Bothnian Sea. Such areas could be introduced as time-limited pilot trials, whose effects are evaluated scientifically. The dialogue on protected areas in the Bothnian Sea has continued between the organisations at a meeting held in February. *** Related documents Read the press release in Swedish and in Finnish . Main outcomes of the workshop in Swedish and Finnish. *** Further information The Fisheries for the Future workshop was a collaborative project between the environmental organisation Coalition Clean Baltic (CCB) and WWF Finland, with funding from Ålandsbanken’s Baltic Sea Project. Among the represented fishing organisations were Suomen Ammattikalastajaliitto/Finlands Yrkesfiskarförbund (Finnish Professional Fishers' Association), Österbottens Fiskarförbund (Ostrobothnia Fishers' Association), Vi Svenska Fiskare (We Swedish Fishers), Kustfiskarna Bottenhavet (Bothnian Sea Coastal Fishers), Ålands fiskare (Åland Fishers) and Sportfiskarna (the Swedish Anglers' Association). Fisheries management was represented by the Government of Åland and the County Administrative Board of Stockholm. In addition, experts from the Natural Resources Institute Finland, the University of Turku and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences participated.