The flood is coming: Water security issues at COP27

CCB • November 21, 2022

Credit: Photograph by Joseph Eid / AFP / Getty & Pexels-2886921 from pixabay

21 November 2022, Sharm el-Sheikh (Egypt) - Although water is not included in the architecture of the Paris Agreement, it's a key topic in the climate agenda as more and more countries and regions are facing the negative consequences of climate change related to water resources. The water crisis is global: droughts, floods, and lack of fresh and clean water are among the negative effects caused by the imbalance of the climate system, already leading to huge infrastructural, financial, and social losses and issues. 


Therefore, COP27 paid much attention to water security, such as sustainable access to clean water to maintain human health, well-being and socio-economic development, protection from water-borne pollution and water-related disasters. There was a Water Pavilion and Ocean Pavilion at the COP venue, and November 14th was declared Water Day as the daily theme of the Conference. But how do these formal acts of attracting attention lead to results and to help solving problems related to water security?

Loss and damage

For the first time in 30 years of UN climate negotiations, thanks to persistent demands from vulnerable countries and the civil society, the discussion on loss and damage  took center stage at COP27, and negotiations were focused on agreeing on the creation of a financing mechanism. As a result, they reached a milestone agreement and a Loss and Damage Fund was established for vulnerable countries.


Civil society activists have been constantly drawing attention to the consequences of climate change and the need for urgent assistance to those who suffer the most from them. On 11 November, a civil society actions -- #FloodTheCop - directly symbolized the floods that many regions are facing. 7 women wearing blue dresses with the slogans “The flood is coming” and “Pay now” carried a simple and understandable message: the G7 and other rich nations have a moral and legal responsibility to tax and wind-down fossil fuel companies based in their territories, and to redirect those finances to people in countries who are suffering the most losses and damages due to climate change. 


Credit: Bianka Csenki (Artivist Network), Instagram @8iank4 (@artivistnet)

Water in the 6th IPCC Assessment Report

Not only the countries of the global south are facing water issues. Water safety is relevant for everyone and the evidence for this is given in the 6th IPCC Assessment Report. During the side the event “IPCC AR6 water security conclusions & launch of the Expanded Water Tracker for National Climate Plans" held on 12 November, Richard Betts, from the University of Exeter and the Met Office and a Lead Author on the IPCC Water chapter, presented the conclusions of the chapter 4 of the report: 

  • 4 billion people experience severe water scarcity for at least one month per year;
  • The total mass of ice is decreasing in all glacial areas;
  • Hundreds of millions of people face changing precipitation patterns: 163 million people face drier conditions, 498 million face wetter conditions.
  • Cases of heavy precipitation are increasing all over the world, which leads to floods
  • Changes in river flows are also observed in many regions (for example, a reduction in hydro energy generation in Northeastern Brazil caused by a 30% reduction in the flow in Sobradinho Dam)
  • The number of droughts is increasing in many regions. And extreme droughts are projected to become more likely with increasing climate change in many regions.

From global changes to real local consequences

Examples of frightening trends are happening all over the world today and directly affect the health and well-being of people, as well as the economic stability of countries. For example, droughts lead to huge damage on food safety. The drought in May-June 2019 in the southwestern of China led to the drying up of more than 100 rivers, and more than 640,100 hectares of crops were destroyed. Direct economic losses amounted to 2.8 billion yuan ($400 million).


This proves that until now we cannot predict the local consequences of climate change and its risks. There is a huge gap between scientific data on the global situation and the local adaptation measures of cities, regions and countries. Rosalind Conforth, from the Walker Institute, shared the approach of the My Climate Risk initiative, which aims to develop and implement a bottom-up approach to regional climate risks. It helps to narrow the gap between massive climate models and apply locally the decision-making practices.

AWARe: Action on Water, Adaptation and Resilience

The new initiative for Water Adaptation and Resilience (AWARe) has been presented at COP27, reflecting the importance of water as both a key climate change problem and a potential solution.  The AWARe initiative, which was drafted by the COP27 Presidency with the support of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), was launched on the Water Day held on 14 November. It is a collective effort, with inputs from many stakeholders and UN agencies.


The AWARe initiative has three main aims:

  1. Decrease water losses worldwide and improve water supply;
  2. Propose and support implementing mutually agreed policy and methods for cooperative water-related adaptation action and its co-benefits;
  3. Promote cooperation and interlinkages between water and climate action in order to achieve Agenda 2030, in particular SDG 6.


It seeks to support promotion of sustainable waste-water management, sanitation policies and strategies, and water-wise energy pathways besides working on improving early warning systems for extreme weather events. It will also work towards linking water resources policies with national climate action to reflect climate change long-term impacts on water resources and demand, and to support preparedness and adaptation measures.


As stated by Dr Elena Manaenkova, WMO Deputy Secretary-General: “[...] WMO supports AWARe as an initiative complementary to the Early Warning for All and the Water and Climate Coalition. AWARe can be a practical vehicle to implement Early Warnings for All, and the Water and Climate Leaders Call to improve water data and information for a climate ready world”.

Consideration of water issues in national climate plans

Another “bottom-up'' approach tool for developing practical measures is the Water Tracker. It helps countries to independently assess and improve water security through the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). They usually ignore the strategic role of water in solving climate problems, although water is necessary both for efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and for adaptation to climate change.


The tool should also help with the distribution of funding among the most vulnerable countries. Dr Amgad Elmadi from the Green Climate Fund (a fund established under the UNFCCC as an operational body of the Financial Mechanism to assist developing countries in adaptation and mitigation to counter climate change) believes that the Water Tracker can affect the quality of climate finance and play a big role in its distribution. 


Today, 10 countries around the world are already involved in the Water Tracker project: Costa Rica, Egypt, Malawi, Somalia, Uganda, Rwanda, Nepal, Palestine, Panama and Uruguay. Ms Nicole Franciso,from the Ministry of the Environment of Panama, said that they are already using this tool to understand how their NDCs will lead to their planned goals. Panama has not yet developed a National Adaptation Plan and claims that with the experience of using the Water Tracker, the development will definitely become more successful. Already now they have realized that data and indicators on water should be included in different sectors of the NDCs, including the energy sector.

Hydropower continues to be the main focus of interest

Rivers play a vital role in carbon sinks and increasing resilience to climate change, but hydroelectric power plants (HPPs) do not allow rivers to perform these essential functions. Despite the proven harm, large-scale hydropower is still considered by some decision-makers as an effective and just solution that helps reduce the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). At the same time, dams and reservoirs can be a major source of methane: in the case of flooding of areas with rich vegetation (which happens extremely often), the rotting of the biomass trapped under water begins. The larger the water surface formed is, as a result of flooding, the greater methane emissions are released.

Credit: Elizaveta Merinova, Friends of the Baltic, Friends of the Earth Russia

Ahead COP26 in Glasgow, 300 organizations from 69 countries issued the Global Declaration "Rivers for Climate", calling on governments and leaders participating in the UN climate negotiations to protect river ecosystems and stop using scarce climate funds to finance false climate solutions such as hydropower. At COP27, the organizations that signed the declaration, as part of the “Centering the protection of Rivers and rights in Achieving Climate Justice” event, spoke about ongoing projects in the field of large hydropower and shared cases of destruction of local ecosystems by HEPPs. Indigenous peoples are being displaced from the territories where their ancestors have lived for many centuries, biodiversity is declining, and flora and fauna are being lost. One of these projects is the Grand Inga, the world's largest hydropower scheme on the Congo River, in Africa. Erick Kassongo, Director of Centre Congolais pour le Développement Durable (CODED), who is working against this project, was right on point saying: “A clean energy source cannot harm the environment and the indigenous peoples of the territory!".

In conclusion

It is difficult to say unequivocally how much the world community is moving forward in solving problems related to water resources and water related disasters. On the one hand, the struggle continues dealing with the consequences of the problem and not with the cause, the promotion of false solutions (such as large hydroelectric power plants), the infringement of indigenous peoples, the degradation of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. On the other hand, there is progress in identifying tools and measures that will lead to ensuring water security. The key components are the analysis and study of the consequences of climate change related to water; improvement of water management; conservation of aquatic ecosystems, including measures to reduce anthropogenic impacts on the climate and on the purity of natural waters. The most important thing is that these measures must lead to a fair solution to problems and be primarily aimed at supporting people and their communities who suffer most from water problems.


The COP27´s final decision is definitely a step forward for the vulnerable countries with the establishment of the Loss and Damage Fund. It also further acknowledges the role of ocean and “the critical role of protecting, conserving and restoring water systems and water-related ecosystems in delivering climate adaptation benefits and co-benefits, while ensuring social and environmental safeguards”, but it's still not enough for other actions needed to keep the 1.5C goal and fight the global climate crisis. 



***

Article written by Elizaveta Merinova and Anna Ushakova, Friends of the Baltic, Friends of the Earth Russia

November 5, 2026
Brussels, 4 November 2026: Environmental NGOs welcome the European Commission’s decision to not include a revision of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) in its 2027 Workplan, announced today, and call on the Commission to maintain this course. To improve ocean health and biodiversity, BirdLife, BLOOM, Coalition Clean Baltic, ClientEarth, Environmental Justice Foundation, Oceana, and Seas At Risk urge the Commission to prioritise full implementation and enforcement of the existing CFP to rebuild fish populations, protect marine ecosystems, and secure a sustainable future for fishers and coastal communities. “The Commission has rightly chosen to follow the findings of its own CFP evaluation , published in April this year, and to focus on holding Member States accountable for implementing the law”, said the NGOs. “Reopening a policy that has not yet reached its full potential would halt timely implementation, waste valuable time and delay the meaningful action that European fishers and marine ecosystems urgently need.” A competitive and resilient fisheries sector can only be built on: healthy fish populations; a system that gives a fair share of space and resources to fishers that have a low impact on the marine ecosystem; and a fleet that is enabled to make a just transition to lower environmental impact, reducing dependence on subsidised fossil fuels, and responding properly to the climate crisis. The CFP outlines a precautionary pathway forward, centering fisheries management on scientific advice and ecosystem protection, minimising the impact of fishing on the marine environment while aiming to provide a sustainably sourced food source for people throughout Europe. “The European Commission must now demonstrate its political ambition by delivering on the CFP, which will allow fish populations to recover, will help achieve food security, along with the wellbeing of European fishers and coastal communities, and protect ocean health”, said the NGOs. “With imminent annual fisheries negotiations between the Commission, Member States and third countries, including the UK and Norway, this will be a key opportunity to finally close a major CFP implementation gap by setting fishing limits that are geared towards rebuilding struggling fish populations and fisheries.” The environmental NGOs call on member states to cooperate with the European Commission on stronger implementation measures to fulfil the objectives of the CFP, and put European citizens and environment at the heart of their position going forward.
By CCB • October 27, 2026
27 October 2026 , Luxembourg - EU fisheries ministers increased central Baltic and Bothnian herring catch limits beyond the European Commission’s proposals and significantly increased the sprat catch limit, falling short of the precaution needed to protect the role of herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea food web. The Council also rejected proposed cuts to accidental catches of severely depleted cod and western Baltic herring populations. NGOs warn that fishing limits remain too high and urge EU ministers to follow the agreement with concrete plans to rebuild depleted fish populations. Herring: further measures needed to safeguard fragile recovery and protect vulnerable populations EU fisheries ministers increased the catch limit for central Baltic herring to 165 228 tonnes, a 71% increase compared with 2026. The population has shown signs of improvement after years of depletion. However, the central Baltic herring population remains vulnerable, and rebuilding must restore healthy age and size structures as well as overall abundance. Although below the scientific headline catch advice, the Council’s decision exceeds the Commission’s proposal, which was more precautionary and recovery-oriented and should have been followed by the ministers. “Ministers have recognised the need for caution, but still allowed more herring to be caught than the Commission proposed. These vulnerable populations need a stronger chance of lasting recovery, with clear rebuilding targets, a timetable for reaching them and measures that are implemented and enforced ,” said Cathrine Pedersen Schirmer, Senior Fisheries Policy Advisor at Coalition Clean Baltic. For Bothnian herring , ministers retained the three-month spawning closure but increased the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) by 12% , despite the population remaining below healthy levels. The Commission’s proposed TAC for this fish population was already a compromise between population rebuilding and maintaining fishing opportunities. The agreed higher TAC poses a risk to the recovery of the Bothnian herring population and creates increasing uncertainty for the industry. “ Fisheries decisions must also account for the risks to fish population recovery. Even catch limits within the ICES advice range can leave stocks at risk of remaining below the biomass levels that should trigger recovery measures. Fishing opportunities must give depleted populations a real chance to recover to healthy level s,” said Beatrice Rindevall, Chairperson of the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. The Gulf of Riga herring TAC was also set above NGOs’ recommendations, with an increase of 11% compared with 2026, despite the recent decline in its spawning biomass and its importance to the Baltic food web. Lower limits for this fish population would have better supported population health and long-term resilience. Sprat: recovery must extend to the Baltic Sea food web The sprat agreement remains a significant concern. The Council’s decision, in line with the Commission’s proposal, to increase the sprat catch limit by 44% to 291 590 tonnes exceeds the level NGOs recommended. Although the population has increased, the agreed limit does not sufficiently account for sprat’s importance as prey for cod, salmon, seabirds and other marine wildlife, persistent catch misreporting or the risk of catching vulnerable herring alongside sprat. “ Herring and sprat are vital to the Baltic Sea ecosystem. When setting fishing opportunities, decision makers must leave enough prey in the water to support predators like cod and salmon, to rebuild ecosystem health and align with the EU’s nature restoration ambitions ,” said Justyna Zajchowska, Fisheries Lead for WWF Baltic Sea Programme. Salmon: no increase in catch limits, but stronger protection needed NGOs welcome the decision not to increase salmon fishing opportunities. However, fishing should be restricted to compensatory hatchery-released salmon or salmon from rivers where populations are at full reproductive capacity. Fishing on vulnerable wild populations must be avoided and, if returning salmon numbers are insufficient, additional adaptive management measures should be deployed immediately, considering the impact of recent poor spawning runs. “ Good returns to some large rivers are encouraging, but they do not demonstrate recovery across the Baltic region. Many smaller river populations remain in serious difficulty. We need fishing restrictions that protect those vulnerable salmon throughout their migration and allow enough fish to reach their spawning grounds ,” said Thomas Johansson, Chairman of Östersjölaxälvar i Samverkan and Secretary General of the Baltic Salmon Fund. Cod, western Baltic herring and plaice: Council misses opportunity to curb bycatch Both Baltic cod populations and western Baltic herring remain severely depleted. Targeted cod fisheries remain closed, while ministers retained the small-scale fisheries exemption for western Baltic herring. Yet ministers agreed bycatch quotas well above the Commission’s proposals for 2027 and at the same level as 2026, falling short of the protection sought by NGOs. For all three populations, the agreed bycatch quotas permit continued catches despite ICES advice for zero catch. The Council’s decision to increase the plaice TAC to 11,237 tonnes , well above the level NGOs recommended, missed an opportunity to secure a reduction in accidental cod catches. The decision also does not reflect the very low reported landings of this species. Declining weight and condition of plaice also warrant greater caution. The TAC must be combined with effective enforcement of mandatory selective gear to reduce cod bycatch and the implementation of the landing obligation. Annual fishing limits must support lasting recovery The Council’s decisions on Baltic Sea fishing opportunities for 2027 are not ambitious enough to secure restoration of all Baltic Sea fish populations. These decisions should be seen in the context of last year’s joint commitment by the European Commission and Baltic Sea Member States to seek dedicated scientific advice from ICES on rebuilding pathways for fish populations. In the absence of such rebuilding-oriented advice, and whilst we are waiting for it, decisions should be more cautious and based on the available recovery-focused catch options provided by the scientists in their traditional advice. Fisheries management must also support EU marine restoration objectives and the achievement of good environmental status in the Baltic Sea. Restoring fish populations and food webs is essential to the recovery of the sea itself and to the long-term future of Baltic fisheries and the coastal communities that depend on them. ENDS *** Further information: Link to Council decision Link to Commission’s proposal Link to Joint NGO recommendations on Baltic Sea fishing opportunities for 2027 Media contact: Beatrice Rindevall, Chairperson, Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, ordforande@naturskyddsforeningen.se Cathrine Pedersen Schirmer , Senior Fisheries Policy Advisor, Coalition Clean Baltic, Cathrine@ccb.se Justyna Zajchowska , Fisheries Lead, WWF Baltic Sea Programme, jzajchowska@wwf.pl Dr. Katja Hockun, Senior Expert Meeresschutz, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., hockun@duh.de Konrad Stralka , Executive Director, BalticWaters, konrad.stralka@balticwaters.org Magda Jentgena , Baltic Sea and Freshwater Programme Manager, Pasaules Dabas Fonds, mjentgena@pdf.lv Regan McEnroe , Chairperson, Nature and Youth Sweden, ordforande@faltbiologerna.se Tapani Veistola, Executive Director, Suomen luonnonsuojeluliitto (Finnish Association for Nature Conservation), tapani.veistola@sll.fi Thomas Johansson , Chairman, Östersjölaxälvar i Samverkan, and Secretary General, Baltic Salmon Fund, thomas@balticsalmonfund.com .