Environmental NGO (Coalition Clean Baltic and World Wide Fund for Nature) Statement for HELCOM Ministerial Meeting on the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan, Krakow, 15 November 2007

CCB • November 15, 2007

ENVIRONMENTAL NGO (COALITION CLEAN BALTIC AND WORLD WIDE FUND FOR NATURE) STATEMENT FOR HELCOM MINISTERIAL MEETING ON THE 
HELCOM BALTIC SEA ACTION PLAN
KRAKOW, POLAND 
15 NOVEMBER 2007

On behalf of the environmental NGOs, Coalition Clean Baltic and WWF, who serve as observers to HELCOM, we appreciate the opportunity to share our position on the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP).  We welcomed HELCOM’s initiative to launch the BSAP process nearly two years ago.  The ambitions of the BSAP to deliver wide-scale and decisive actions necessary to achieve a good ecological status for the Baltic Sea was seen by CCB and WWF as fulfilling a critical need to achieve ecosystem based management in the Baltic Sea region.

Originally, the proposed text of the plan did indeed include many of the strong actions and tough decisions that so urgently needed.  Over time, however, the plan has been successively narrowed in scope and weakened due to political and economic disagreements between CPs and economic sectors like agriculture and fisheries – so much so that the plan you now seek to adopt is but a shadow of its former self. 
Instead, the BSAP is now high on rhetoric but missing many of the very ambitious actions and commitments which were the reason the BSAP was originally conceived.  In fact, the plan rarely steps beyond actions which have already been agreed on and negotiated in other fora.  This is important, but does little to demonstrate the added value of the BSAP and indeed HELCOM itself. As a result, the plan you are now set to endorse will unfortunately not reach its ambitious aims or objectives. 
Two of the biggest threats to the ecosystem of the Baltic Sea are eutrophication and the overfishing of cod.  The adopted HELCOM BSAP 
-   takes a positive first step towards addressing Eutrophication, e.g. with country-wise quotas for nutrient reduction, but this will not solve the total problem
-   unfortunately takes no actions to address the obvious risk for collapse of the Baltic cod stocks which could dramatically deteriorate the Baltic Sea ecosystem.  

Further, the plan is lacking:
-   Strong actions to shift CAP-subsidies in Baltic Sea into agri-environmental programmes which are needed to contribute to a substantial reduction of the nutrient run-off from agriculture. 
-   Strong actions to safeguard the Baltic Harbour Porpoise, which are at risk of collapse. 
-   Actions to address the threat of climate change, which is expected to significantly increase the effects of eutrophication on the Baltic Sea are absent.
-   Strong actions to stem the threat posed to the Baltic ecosystem by the introduction of alien species into the Baltic Sea via ships ballast water.
-   Strong actions to control nutrient run-off from agriculture, e.g. the designation of the whole Baltic catchment as a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone.

Additionally, since little attention has been given to how this plan will be implemented, coordinated, funded and evaluated - there is no clear understanding regarding how HELCOM and the CPs will even be able to manage and monitor this plan. Finally, even the few actions that have been identified are recommendatory and non-binding.  This means that there is no guarantee that contracting parties will even take these actions.  

We do appreciate, however, actions such as:
-   The country-wise nutrient reduction requirements which have been agreed by CPs.
-   The actions identified to ensure better environmental control for Industrial Animal Farms (Intensive rearing livestock farms) in Annex III of Helsinki Convention.
-   The establishment of a list of Hot Spots, identifying Industrial animal farms, not fulfilling IPPC directive
-   The active conservation of at least 10 threatened wild salmon river populations in Baltic Sea.

Overall, we are concerned with the very low ambitions for protection of the Baltic Sea environment from many Baltic Sea region countries and believe the true failure of this plan can be directly traced to the lack of political will and leadership on behalf of CPs.  Looking around the room – it is disheartening to see that this ‘Ministerial’ meeting does not even include Environmental Ministers from Denmark, Germany and Latvia, which may indicate the low importance of this process for these CPs.  
Furthermore, as the original intention of the BSAP was to take a holistic and integrated approach to tackling the many challenges in the region – it was a flawed intention from the start to only seek to include the agreement of environmental ministers.  In order to be successful, this plan requires strong support from the highest level of government of each CP, and commitment that the BSAP will be implemented in a coordinated and integrated way across ALL relevant ministries and departments.    
Clearly, your colleagues in the Ministries of Agriculture, Fisheries and Economy seem to have low ambitions for Baltic Sea Protection and would rather keep to business as usual.  Their influence has been quite evident during the negotiations and subsequent weakening of the text.  This is why it is so important that you strengthen your own expertise in these areas in order to achieve sustainable agriculture and fisheries for Baltic Sea protection.  

Despite the weaknesses of this plan, the original intention of the BSAP remains valid – the Baltic Sea still needs urgent and concerted action to protect and restore it to ‘good ecological status’.   We therefore urge each of you to seek the support of your Prime Ministers/Presidents and take responsibility for:
1.   Implementing the BSAP but acknowledge that the implementation of the plan will not be enough to reach the goals and objectives of the BSAP and to therefore:
2.   Take responsibility for its weaknesses and failures by developing a process to address the still urgent need to take dramatic and integrated action to save the Baltic Sea – ensuring that this action is taken at the highest level of each CP (where Agriculture and Fisheries sectors must take their full responsibility)– ideally in the form of a summit meeting in order to secure the health of the Baltic and therefore the continued economic success and quality of life of  our region.
The Baltic Sea, and indeed the people around the Baltic Sea region, deserves more than declarations. Only real action and accountable leadership can achieve this – we therefore acknowledge you, Baltic Ministers of Environment and EC DG Env, as our most important partners to save the Baltic Sea environment and urge you to act and learn from the failings of this process. Thank you for your attention!  

By CCB October 1, 2025
Job Title: Coalition Campaign Manager - Common Fisheries Policy Position type : Full-time consultancy contract. Open to part-time arrangements initially if needed. Contract duration: Short-term contract until end of March 2026, with possibility of extension subject to funding availability Reports to: Steering Committee Location : Flexible(remote/home office) with regular travel. Working in Brussels is of advantage. Starting date : ASAP In close cooperation with the Steering Group of the coaltion, lead, plan, coordinate, and support the campaign of an NGO network working together towards the implementation of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the evaluation thereof. The campaign manager's responsibility is to develop and ensure the successful and timely delivery of political advocacy and public engagement activities of the campaign, both at EU and Member State level. Job description Strategy & Planning Develop and implement short-, and long-term campaign strategies aligned with coalition objectives, in close cooperation with the Steering Group. Set clear goals, timelines, and performance indicators for the campaign and ensure timely delivery thereof. Analyse policy development, political climate, media and public opinion, and stakeholder landscapes to inform tactics. Campaign Delivery Manage day-to-day execution of the campaign activities at Brussels and Member State level. Coordinate coalition partners and ensure communication between Steering Group and coalition members, as well as relevant groups/coalitions/experts and other stakeholders outside the coalition. Advise coalition members on strategic delivery of advocacy activities at all levels, including Member State level. Join Steering Group meetings in an advisory capacity. Report back to the Steering Group on the delivery of the campaign's activities, meeting of targets and milestones, and report back on activities, budget and impact. Advocacy & Stakeholder Engagement Build and maintain relationships with policymakers, key stakeholders, and allies to support campaign aims. Analyse opportunities of engagement, advise on policy language. Organise/coordinate/prepare and support relevant activities, including events, briefings, and advocacy activities in close cooperation with coalition members. Ensure relevant knowledge management and information flow within the coalition and across partner organisations. Liaise with communication experts on message framing, strategy and timelines. Management Support CCB administrative and finance staff managing grants to coalition partners. Ensure coalition partners receive information and materials that enable them to effectively contribute to achieving campaign goals (political information, policy briefings, templates, policy language, opportunity analyses). Support fundraising efforts as needed/requested by the Steering Group. Lead on funders narrative reporting. Qualifications & Skills required The consultant must be legally authorised to provide services and work as a consultant within the EU, based in an EU Member State. Fisheries and ocean expertise (preferred), or other environmental background. Degree (or equivalent experience) in communications/campaign management, political science, resource management, fisheries, or related field. Proven track record in designing and delivering successful advocacy or public campaigns at EU or Member State levels involving a larger coalition. Strong understanding of political processes at EU level and Member State levels, media landscapes, and public engagement. Excellent project management and organisational skills. Skilled communicator and coordinator, able to craft persuasive messages and engage a larger network into a common goal within tight deadlines. Ability to work under pressure, meet deadlines, and adapt to rapidly changing circumstances. Fluency in English is required; additional EU languages are a plus. Application Should you be interested in applying for this assignment, please send your CV (max. 2 pages) together with a personal letter (max. 1 page) before 9 October 2025 , COB, to secretariat@ccb.se Please include your consultancy rate in your application inclusive VAT (if applicable). Applications should be submitted in English. Incomplete applications (e.g. lacking either CV or personal letter) will not be considered . Any inquiries related to this assignment should be forwarded to the above email or to CCB Executive Secretary Mikhail Durkin at mikhail.durkin@ccb.se and +46 739 770 793. In the application and hiring process, CCB will not discriminate against any individual based on race, colour, sex, language, religion, national or social origin, property, disability, age, family status, sexual orientation and gender identity, economic and social situation. .
By CCB September 9, 2025
A new report from the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and its member organisations reveals widespread PFAS contamination in wild fish across Europe, with many samples far exceeding proposed new safety limits. These so-called "forever chemicals" pose a growing threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems - yet EU Member States are pushing to delay action on needed pollution controls until 2039.