Baltic youth movements to Danish Ministers: "Our future is at stake Stop the Lynetteholm project and consult all Baltic Sea countries!"

CCB • October 26, 2023

26 October 2023, Uppsala / Copenhagen / Stralsund - Today, environmental and youth NGOs from 11 countries of the Baltic Sea Region representing over 1,500,000 citizens sent a letter [1] to the Danish Minister of Transport, Thomas Danielsen, and the Danish Minister of Environment, Magnus Heunicke, expres sing their deep concern about the Lynetteholm project [2], an artificial island in the Copenhagen harbour that may affect the biodiversity and ecological state of the entire Baltic Sea.


According to Stiig Markager, a Danish Professor of marine ecology and biochemistry at Aarhus University, the artificial island may block the flow of vital oxygen rich salt water through the Danish Øresund to the Baltic Sea a blockage that according to hi m can have significant, irreversible, negative environmental consequences for the Baltic Sea and all the countries around it [3].


Therefore, young people living in the Baltic Sea Region call on Danish Ministers to promptly engage an independent multinational marine expert body that will have a clear overview of the cumulative environmental effects of all projects in the Baltic Sea marine areas and the responsibility for the status of Øresund and the Baltic Sea.


"The Danish authorities are ignoring not only us, young people and concerned citizens, but also scientists and International and European laws  [4]. It is our future, the future of our children and that of the marine environment of the entire Baltic Sea that is at stake. Therefore, we urge the
Danish Parliament to engage an independent multinational marine council to evaluate the potential environmental consequences of Lynetteholm as well as of future projects in the Baltic Sea
", commented Maren Høj Muff from the Green Youth Movement in Denmark, as one of the representatives of the environmental and youth NGOs behind the letter.


Until then, they request the Danish ministers to immediately put the Lynetteholm project on hold and to consult all countries that may be environmentally and financially affected by this project because as they state “a good cooperation between the Baltic Sea countries is an absolute necessity not only to protect the marine environment of the Baltic Sea, but also to see us move towards a better future”.


***


For further information, please contact:
Mikhail Durkin, CCB Executive Secretary:
mikhail.durkin@ccb.se 
(+46) 739 770 793


Maren Høj Muff, The Green Youth Movement in Denmark: mhmuff@gmail.com
(+45) 4086 2101


Moritz Röhlke, NAJU Rostock: rostock@naju-mv.de


Daniela Herrmann, Scientific Associate Marine Conservation, Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU): Daniela.Herrmann@nabu.de
+ 49 (0)162 2050373


***

NOTES for the editors:


[1] The full letter is available here.


[2] In June 2021, A majority in the Danish Parliament approved the Lynetteholm project, allowing the construction of an artificial island of 2.8 km2 that will provide a new residential area for 35,000 inhabitants and 35,000 workplaces in the outlet of Copenhagen harbour. The project is due to be completed in 50 years’ time (2070). More info: https://www.ccb.se/-stoplynetteholm-campaign


[3] The Baltic Sea is brackish water and only receives oxygen rich salt water from the Atlantic Ocean through the three Danish seas Øresund, Great Belt and Little Belt. According to Stiig Markager, Professor of marine ecology and biochemistry at Aarhus University, there is a high degree of certainty that even a minor reduction in the salinity of the Baltic Sea will have significant negative consequences for biodiversity and the ecological state of the Baltic Sea. Read his memo /analysis sent directly to Danish politicians (April 2023).


[4] Under the UN Espoo Convention and the EU's SEA/EIA Directives, the authorities of a country are obliged to consult all countries that may be environmentally affected by a construction project unless "significant transboundary impact can be excluded with certainty". The Lynetteholm project was approved despite Swedish criticism and without consultation of all the Baltic Sea countries despite the fact that all Baltic Sea countries may be affected.


So far, only Sweden has been consulted under the Espoo Convention. However, the Lynetteholm project was adopted in the Danish Parliament in June 2021 despite the fact that the Swedish Minister of Environment and Climate a month before had sent a letter directly to the Danish Minister of Environment in which he emphasizes the importance of the Danish Parliament not taking any decisions regarding Lynetteholm before the environmental impacts have been properly investigated and before the Espoo consultations between Denmark and Sweden have been finalised. His letter was kept secret and not forwarded to the members of the Danish Parliament before voting about the Lynetteholm project (read the full letter in English here: Microsoft Word - Per Bolund 2021 letter final.docx (cdn-website.com) and the original here: Aktindsigtsoversigt 4 - Maj-2021-Jan 2022.pdf (cdn-website.com). In addition, a letter sent to the Danish authorities in May 2023 on behalf of six Swedish authorities - where they repeat their concern for the Baltic Sea and ask about the solution regarding the blocking of saline water to the Baltic Sea - has so far been ignored (read the full letter in English here Microsoft Word - Naturvaardsverket letter May 2023 final.docx (cdn-website.com) and the original here: Yttrande remissvar (cdn-website.com)

 

Photos by IISD/ENB - Natalia Mroz
By CCB July 2, 2025
The first meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on the Global Framework on Chemicals (GFC) was held in Punta del Este, Uruguay, from 23–27 June 2025 , bringing together government representatives, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, including the Coalition Clean Baltic representative, the private sector, youth, and academia. This marked the first global gathering since the GFC was adopted at the Fifth International Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM5) in 2023. The primary focus of OEWG-1 was to take stock of progress since ICCM5 and to discuss how best to operationalize the framework’s goals. Participants exchanged views on implementation needs and priorities, as well as preparatory work for the first International conference of GFC , expected in 2026. Advancing Implementation Programmes Across Key Sectors A central discussion point was the development of terms of reference (ToR) for three Implementation Programmes under the GFC. One of these programmes will include sector-specific sub-programmes , aiming to promote safer chemicals management practices in industries such as electronics, textiles, health care, and construction . The intent is to support sector-wide engagement, innovation, and accountability in reducing chemical risks. Delegates also addressed the selection and future treatment of chemical Issues of Concern (IoCs) - substances or groups of substances that require global attention, e.g. lead in paints, highly hazardous pesticides, environmentally persistent pharmaceutical pollutants , and others) . While there was broad support for retaining all currently recognized IoCs, discussions highlighted the need for clear criteria, dedicated workplans, and adequate resourcing to ensure each IoC is actively addressed rather than left unresolved. Financing as a Cornerstone of Effective Implementation Discussions made clear that successful implementation of the GFC will require adequate, sustained, and predictable financial resources . The meeting explored the operation of the GFC Fund , with particular attention to how it might be improved to ensure equitable access to financial resources , especially for low- and middle-income countries. Ideas for a resource mobilization strategy were also shared, with many participants emphasizing the importance of sustained public and private sector contributions. There was significant support for applying the “polluter pays” principle , ensuring that industries contributing to chemical pollution take financial responsibility for managing its impacts. The intersessional work ahead of COP1 will be critical for shaping a robust financing mechanism that matches the framework’s ambition. Global Alliance on Highly Hazardous Pesticides launched A major milestone from the meeting was the launch of the Global Alliance on Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) . This new initiative aims to promote international collaboration, knowledge exchange, and support for safer alternatives, including agroecological approaches that reduce reliance on harmful substances in agriculture. Regional Perspectives: Implications for the Baltic Sea “ For the Baltic Sea region , chemicals management remains a critical environmental and public health issue ”, commented Eugeniy Lobanov, Leader of the Hazardous Substances Working Area at Coalition Clean Baltic . “ Implementation of the GFC provides an opportunity to reinforce regional actions under the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan , especially concerning the reduction of hazardous substances entering the marine environment, e.g., pharmaceutical pollutants ”. It is important that Baltic Sea countries actively contribute to the GFC’s development and ensure regional priorities are reflected in global strategies. To read summary report of OEWG 1 . *** Article written by Eugeniy Lobanov, CCB Hazardous Substances Working Area Leader Photos by IISD/ENB - Natalia Mroz
By CCB June 17, 2025
On Wednesday, 28 May, the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) published its scientific advice for fish stocks in the Baltic Sea . In response, environmental NGOs from around the Baltic Sea region urge the European Commission to propose, and fisheries ministers to adopt, fishing opportunities at levels well below the headline advice to safeguard ecosystem needs and dynamics and allow for rapid recovery of Baltic Sea fish populations.