AGRIFISH agreement: EU member states ignore facts and science - active fishing for critically endangered eel is not banned

CCB • December 13, 2022

With no support in facts or science [1], the EU fisheries ministers have decided to continue chasing the critically endangered eel. The EU Member States actively opposed to sensible proposals to further the survival of European eel and the same Member States must now go to the Montreal COP15 and declare that “we should create a shared future for all life on earth – except for eel”.

Today the Fisheries Council decided [2] to continue targeting the critically endangered eel. The EU Commission proposed a consecutive six-month ban of fishing but this was aggressively opposed by countries led by France, Sweden, Denmark and Spain. The Commissioner called out the Member States as being dishonest in their approach, considering that they have during the past year written and spoken about further measures to protect the eel multiple times. Now, when a proposal to actually safeguard migration of adult eels as well as recently born eels was on the table, they shoot it down.


The original proposal was watered down to be a three plus three-month ban but with options for derogation and opening up the chance for Member States to place the closure period when it has little or no impact.  The Member States acted with no support in science and instead, against facts and figures presented over 20 years, pushed forward another massive loophole to continue active fishing on this critically endangered species.

 

It is as if they intentionally wants to kill off the last eels by both allowing fishing to continue and at the same time not doing anything to improve eel habitats and migration routes. Most member states cannot even close their own internal waters for recreational fishing, a fishing for fun on an endangered species, even though anglers support such a ban!” says Nils Höglund, CCB Fisheries Policy Officer. He continues: “It is now difficult to take these countries statements and words seriously in anything related to biodiversity protection. We must applaud the Commission for trying and for pressuring the Member States, knowing that even the proposal for a 6-month ban was not enough but at least something.”


FURTHER INFORMATION:


[1]
ICES Advice on European eel (3 November 2022).


[2] The full outcome of the Agrifish council is available here:


Photos by IISD/ENB - Natalia Mroz
By CCB July 2, 2025
The first meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on the Global Framework on Chemicals (GFC) was held in Punta del Este, Uruguay, from 23–27 June 2025 , bringing together government representatives, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, including the Coalition Clean Baltic representative, the private sector, youth, and academia. This marked the first global gathering since the GFC was adopted at the Fifth International Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM5) in 2023. The primary focus of OEWG-1 was to take stock of progress since ICCM5 and to discuss how best to operationalize the framework’s goals. Participants exchanged views on implementation needs and priorities, as well as preparatory work for the first International conference of GFC , expected in 2026. Advancing Implementation Programmes Across Key Sectors A central discussion point was the development of terms of reference (ToR) for three Implementation Programmes under the GFC. One of these programmes will include sector-specific sub-programmes , aiming to promote safer chemicals management practices in industries such as electronics, textiles, health care, and construction . The intent is to support sector-wide engagement, innovation, and accountability in reducing chemical risks. Delegates also addressed the selection and future treatment of chemical Issues of Concern (IoCs) - substances or groups of substances that require global attention, e.g. lead in paints, highly hazardous pesticides, environmentally persistent pharmaceutical pollutants , and others) . While there was broad support for retaining all currently recognized IoCs, discussions highlighted the need for clear criteria, dedicated workplans, and adequate resourcing to ensure each IoC is actively addressed rather than left unresolved. Financing as a Cornerstone of Effective Implementation Discussions made clear that successful implementation of the GFC will require adequate, sustained, and predictable financial resources . The meeting explored the operation of the GFC Fund , with particular attention to how it might be improved to ensure equitable access to financial resources , especially for low- and middle-income countries. Ideas for a resource mobilization strategy were also shared, with many participants emphasizing the importance of sustained public and private sector contributions. There was significant support for applying the “polluter pays” principle , ensuring that industries contributing to chemical pollution take financial responsibility for managing its impacts. The intersessional work ahead of COP1 will be critical for shaping a robust financing mechanism that matches the framework’s ambition. Global Alliance on Highly Hazardous Pesticides launched A major milestone from the meeting was the launch of the Global Alliance on Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) . This new initiative aims to promote international collaboration, knowledge exchange, and support for safer alternatives, including agroecological approaches that reduce reliance on harmful substances in agriculture. Regional Perspectives: Implications for the Baltic Sea “ For the Baltic Sea region , chemicals management remains a critical environmental and public health issue ”, commented Eugeniy Lobanov, Leader of the Hazardous Substances Working Area at Coalition Clean Baltic . “ Implementation of the GFC provides an opportunity to reinforce regional actions under the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan , especially concerning the reduction of hazardous substances entering the marine environment, e.g., pharmaceutical pollutants ”. It is important that Baltic Sea countries actively contribute to the GFC’s development and ensure regional priorities are reflected in global strategies. To read summary report of OEWG 1 . *** Article written by Eugeniy Lobanov, CCB Hazardous Substances Working Area Leader Photos by IISD/ENB - Natalia Mroz
By CCB June 17, 2025
On Wednesday, 28 May, the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) published its scientific advice for fish stocks in the Baltic Sea . In response, environmental NGOs from around the Baltic Sea region urge the European Commission to propose, and fisheries ministers to adopt, fishing opportunities at levels well below the headline advice to safeguard ecosystem needs and dynamics and allow for rapid recovery of Baltic Sea fish populations.