|
FOR PROTECTION OF THE BALTIC SEA ENVIRONMENT
Increased Maritime Safety
for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea urgently needed
Statement prepared by BUND Working
Group "Meer und Küste" (Seas and Coasts), May
2004
The
increase in shipping and maritime trade in the North Sea and
the Baltic Sea regions represents an ever increasing risk for
our seas and coastal areas. Extensive measures to improve maritime
safety are urgently required in order to counteract this growing
threat. Not only the recent major pollution incidents, involving
the tanker Erika off the coast of Brittany, the Baltic
Carrier in the Baltic Sea and the Prestige off the
Spanish coast, but also many near misses are exemplary warnings
of the threats lurking on the seas at our doorstep.
The urgency of this problem
is magnified by the increase in Russian tanker traffic in both
the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. Russia currently expands her
oil terminal capacities in the Gulf of Finland and redirects
oil exports from the Black Sea to the Baltic.
A new pipeline, leading
from Kazakhstan to St. Petersburg, will eventually double the
amount of oil transported to the Baltic for export. Likewise,
the Baltic States are upgrading their oil ports. These trends
show that in future a significantly higher proportion of tankers,
and typically old tankers with low safety and maintenance standards,
will pass through our coastal seas. Action needs to be taken!
The following catalogue
of demands stipulates the main measures the BUND believes need
to be taken in order reduce the risk of shipping accidents in
the North Sea and the Baltic.
Maritime Traffic Monitoring
The
BUND demands complete radar monitoring of vessels along the
Wadden Sea/North Sea and the Baltic Sea including the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ), supplemented by an Automatic Identification
System (AIS), until the end of 2003.
The principal requirement
for a safety concept is a continuous monitoring of vessel movements.
The goals of traffic monitoring are the identification of all
vessels and the generation and continuous updating of the traffic
situation. This form of control can only be realised by the
use of long-range radar tracking. The gradual introduction of
Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) for vessels from a certain
size upwards represents a useful additional control mechanism,
but does not replace the necessity for long-range radar surveillance
as small vessels are not covered.
Maritime Traffic Routeing
and Regulation
The
BUND demands safety-oriented regulation of maritime traffic
to avoid or minimise risk until 2004. This can be done via mandatory
navigational assistance from radar-operating pilots for all
vessels in adverse environmental circumstances, such as low
visibility, strong gales, storms, and ice.
To date, radar-based routing
service is only provided following special request, and is limited
to vessels of a certain size or cargo, such as oil, chemicals
and other dangerous goods. Furthermore, routing is only offered
for a few shipping areas and approaches. In future, the service
must be extended to include all territorial waters and the EEZ
in order to ease navigation in North and Baltic Sea waters easier
for all ships, thus reducing risk.
It is
necessary to organise maritime traffic regulation similarly
to aviation control in order to avoid potentially dangerous
situations. This includes, for instance, regulatory mechanisms
which prohibit the close passage of passenger ships and chemical
tankers in narrow navigational lanes. Change of the planned
route in good time reduces risk and alleviates the flow of traffic.
Ideally, this would be realised by the formation of one or several
international traffic control centres for a complete
monitoring of vessel traffic, applicable to wider regional sea
areas.
Compulsory Pilotage
The
BUND demands an extension of compulsory pilotage for all navigation
lanes within territorial waters, inclusive of the EEZ, for all
vessels transporting oil, chemicals, gas and other dangerous
goods until the end of 2003.
The
BUND also demands compulsory pilotage for all vessels with a
draft in excess of 9m (tankers: > 7m), and for all vessels
in excess of 180m length, destined for the Baltic Sea approaches
Great Belt, Little Belt, Sound; as well as the Kadetrenden,
the Gulf of Finland and the Bothnian Sea.
In the Kadetrenden, for
which pilotage is recommended for deep-draft vessels, approximately
95% of vessels take pilots onboard. None of the 20 vessels or
so which have grounded there in the past five years had a pilot
on board!
Land-based routing and
advisory service alone is certainly no substitute for on-board
pilotage, since it lacks direct information regarding the situation
onboard as well as the possibility for immediate mitigative
intervention.
PSSA Status for the Particularly
Sensitive Baltic Sea
The
BUND demands the designation of the whole Baltic Sea including
Russian territorial Waters as a PSSA (Particularly Sensitive
Sea Area) in line with the IMO (International Maritime Organisation)
and the adoption of appropriate measures to improve the
maritime safety by the IMO.
PSSAs are marine areas
requiring special protection due to their ecological, economic,
cultural or scientific significance and their specific vulnerability
towards detrimental effects of maritime traffic. As now for
most of the Baltic Sea the PSSA status has been granted by the
IMO, special measures, which exceed the already internationally
recognised IMO standards, have to be adopted by the IMO and
implemented.
Such measures may include,
-
the establishment of
traffic separation schemes,
-
compulsory navigational
lanes,
-
closed areas,
-
compulsory pilotage
,
-
the introduction of
formal maritime traffic management.
Task Force and Combating
Capacity
The
BUND demands the provision of adequate and well coordinated
task force resources (salvage tugs, fire fighting, spill combating
and lighter vessels) until 2005 which mirror the level of existing
maritime traffic and are upgraded in line with future traffic
development.
Maritime traffic in the North and the Baltic Sea is continuously
growing, with an increase in both, vessel quantity and size, e.g.
container ships with 8000 TEU in the North Sea, requiring tugs
with >220 tons bollard pull (tow force) in order to be manoeuvred
and/or stopped in strong gale or storm conditions.
Ocean-going salvage tugs
with a high tow force and speed are necessary, particularly
in emergency situations in rough weather. The objective is to
be ready for on-site emergency assistance within two hours.
Places of Refuge Network
The
BUND demands the establishment of a “Places of Refuge
Network” for ship casualties along the North and Baltic
Sea coasts in agreement with neighbouring states until 2004.
The secret lists which
exist since a short time should be made public to inform and
prepare local authorities and volunteer organisations, as well
as improve resources and training.
For
years, salvage experts have called for the provision of safe
havens as emergency refuges or safe anchorages to be used by
ships in distress, e.g. the tanker Castor in the Mediterranean.
The Prestige accident could probably have been prevented by
allowing the damaged ship into port.
Strengthening of Port
State Controls (PSCs)
The
BUND demands tougher port state controls and corresponding significant
increases in state funding. Adequate personnel and technical
resources must be made available for the existing port state
controls, and likewise for a tougher control regime in future.
Port
state controls (PSCs) are exercised world-wide.
This includes an inspection of compliance with internationally
recognised minimum maritime safety regulations onboard vessels,
carried out by representatives of the port state. This audit
is mostly limited to an examination of certificates and vessel
logs; and only rarely an evaluation of the real state of the
ship, its equipment and sea crew.
The
crude oil tanker Erika, which broke up in December 1999
off the Atlantic coast of France, was subject to port state
control and passed without cause for complaint only days prior
to sailing. The European Union has therefore initiated a tightening
of port state controls as part of a catalogue of measures designed
to improve safety at sea.
Reduction of Risk of Hazardous
Substance Discharges following Shipping Accidents
The
BUND demands a ban of single-hull tankers in the North Sea and
the Baltic Sea preferable until 2005, and in no case later than
2008. In addition, the BUND demands the safeguarding against
hazardous substance emissions from vessels other than tankers
by the use double-hull vessel design.
Hazardous liquids like
ship's fuel must no longer be transported in tanks whose outer
walls are part of the hull of the vessel. The use of double-hull
tanks represents an urgently required reduction in emissions
risk in the case of groundings or collisions.
For
smaller vessels engaged in national coastal shipping,
and for all regular ferry lines, the BUND
demands exclusive use of lighter fuel types (i.e. marine
diesel oil, marine gas oil), reducing air emissions as well
as the risk of long-term water and coastal pollution.
For further information:
BUND
AK Meer & Küste
stefan.menzel@bund.net
or wolfgang.guenther@bund.net
|